May 08, 2024 00:27 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Haryana govt loses majority, 3 Independent MLAs withdraw support | Modi accuses Sonia Gandhi of 'appeasement politics', latter returns jibe saying BJP promotes 'hatred' | Election Commission asks X to remove 'derogatory' post by Karnataka BJP | Lok Sabha Election 2024 phase 3 voting: Polling ends with 61.08% turnout | Bengal teacher recruitment scam: Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC order cancelling 25,000 school jobs; slams West Bengal govt
Shakti Mill gangrape case: Bombay HC upholds death sentence of 3 convicts

Shakti Mill gangrape case: Bombay HC upholds death sentence of 3 convicts

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 03 Jun 2019, 11:13 am

Mumbai, Jun 3 (UNI) The Bombay High Court on Monday dismissed petitions filed by three convicts in the Shakti Mill Gangrape Case and upheld the constitutional validity of the IPC section 376E which states that a repeat rape offender should be imprisoned for the rest of his life or sentenced to death.

A division bench of Justice B P Dharmadhikari and Justice Revati Mohite Dere dismissed petitions filed by the trio convicts challenging the constitutional validity of the legal provisions under which they were sentenced to death in 2014.

The stringent provision was added after an amendment made by the Parliament in the year 2013 post Nirbhaya gangrape incident.

"We are of the opinion that section 376 (e) of the IPC is not ultra vires to the Constitution and hence need not be quashed in the present case,” the court said.

The law was challenged by the trio convicts-Vijay Jadhav,Mohammed Kasim Bengali,and Mohammed Salim Ansari-all sentenced to death by a sessions court in 2014 for the gangrape of a city-based photojournalist on August 22, 2013.

The same year, the trio convicts were also found guilty for raping a call centre employee.

Both instances of gangrape had taken place in 2013 in the Shakti Mills compound.

The trials in both the cases were held simultaneously and the conviction was handed out on the same day.

However, the trial court proceeded to pronounce the punishment in the call centre employee case and subsequently allowed a prosecution plea to charge the convicts under the IPC section 376E.

Image: UNI

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.