April 26, 2024 23:49 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court rejects plea seeking 100 pct votes verification on EVMs, rules out returning to ballot papers | Voting concludes in 88 constituencies with 61% turnout by 5 pm | Justice MB Snehalatha takes oath as additional judge of Kerala High Court | NIA arrests key accused in pro-Khalistani attack on Indian Mission in London | Plea filed in Calcutta HC seeking action against Mamata Banerjee's 'judges purchased' remark
Bhutanese court scraps sedition case against businessman; verdict hailed as victory of democracy Bhutan
Image: Pixabay

Bhutanese court scraps sedition case against businessman; verdict hailed as victory of democracy

By South Asia Monitor/IBNS | @indiablooms | 20 Jun 2021, 07:33 pm

A sedition case against Penjore, a businessman, was perhaps one of the most keenly watched legal cases in recent times in Bhutan. A conviction would have been perceived by most Bhutanese, if not all,  as the end of freedom of speech and the rule of constitutional law. A Thimphu district court in Bhutan, this week, dismissed the case, restoring the confidence of many people in the virtues of dissent and criticism in a democracy. 

A few weeks back Penjore had criticized Bhutanese authorities, state institutions, and state officials in a Facebook post, and called the country a “lawless nation”. The post drew many likes and comments from fellow Bhutanese.

As the post went viral, he was arrested by Bhutanese authorities--that too without an arrest warrant-- and was kept in detention for 16 days illegally, according to a Bhutanese state-owned newspaper Kuensel. He was slapped with defamation and libel among other charges. 

However, the court’s silence on his illegal arrest and detention, in contrast with established laws, infuriated many Bhutanese who saw the police actions as an abuse of power and bureaucratic intolerance of criticism.

On Friday, Bhutan’s Office of Attorney General filed a 9-page charge sheet in the court, converting the earlier defamation charges to sedition.

The nine-page charges detailed how Penjore had made series of"‘scurrilous and malignant" written statements on Facebook against the state, with the particular intent to "defame, encourage contempt and incite hatred against people occupying positions in public institutions, and undermine the rule of law, the democratic principles, and reputation of the country".

The court, while dismissing the case, pointed out several shortcomings. Earlier, remand and investigation were sought on the charges of defamation and libel, the court said. It also objected to the mentioning of the judiciary in the case, saying it (judiciary) had no complaints against the defendant’s reference to the institution in his Facebook post.

Unconvinced of the charges, the court dismissed the case. Kuensel also reported that the government said it would now appeal against the district court judgement in the high court.

The judgment was hailed by a wider section of the Bhutanese society as the victory of the constitution.

“The court not accepting the case speaks volumes of checks and balances in our democratic system and that the judiciary is willing to protect rights without fear and favor, as enshrined in the Constitution,” wrote Kuensel. the country's oldest English language daily, in its editorial on Saturday.

Tenzing Lamsang, the president of the Journalists Association of Bhutan and the editor of The Bhutanese, wrote on Twitter, “the Judiciary showed both wisdom and mercy in its handling of the case yesterday, and in doing so it has elevated itself and Bhutanese Democracy to a higher level.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.