April 29, 2024 14:17 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Congress' Indore Lok Sabha candidate Akshay Bam joins BJP just days ahead of elections | Delhi Police registers case over doctored video of Amit Shah advocating abolition of reservation | After delaying India trip, Elon Musk visits China, meets Premier Li Qiang | 'Not joining any other party': Arvinder Singh Lovely after resigning as Delhi Congress chief | Bus carrying 36 people erupts in flames in Mumbai-Pune Expressway, all passengers safe
UN rights experts ‘gravely concerned’ by reports of reprisals against Burundian lawyers

UN rights experts ‘gravely concerned’ by reports of reprisals against Burundian lawyers

India Blooms News Service | | 08 Aug 2016, 10:47 pm
New York, Aug 8 (Just Earth News): Gravely concerned by reports that four Burundian lawyers who provided information to the United Nations Committee on Torture (CAT) are being subjected to reprisals, the body said on Monday that it has sent a letter to the Ambassador of Burundi to the United Nations in Geneva seeking assurances that no member of Burundian civils society would be subjected to such treatment for cooperating with the CAT.

In a press statement issued by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Committee said the four lawyers – Armel Niyongere, Lambert Nigarura, Dieudonné Bashirahishize and Vital Nshimirimana – had contributed to an alternative report by a coalition of Burundian non-governmental organizations for the its review, and three were present at the review in Geneva on 28 and 29 July.

According to the Committee, on 29 July, a Burundian prosecutor asked the President of the Bujumbura Bar Council to strike the lawyers off the professional register, alleging that they had committed several offences, including involvement in an insurrectionist movement and an attempted coup.

The Committee’s letter, signed by Chair Jens Modvig and Rapporteur on Reprisals Alessio Bruni, notes that the prosecutor requested sanctions against the lawyers, rather than an inquiry to establish the facts, “which raises concerns with respect to presumption of innocence.”

It goes on to state that this concern “is all the stronger given that the (prosecutor’s) request came on the same day that the Burundian delegation, presided over by the Minister of Justice, indicated they would not be participating in the second session of dialogue with the Committee, citing the alternative report by Burundian civil society in particular as the reason.”

Modvig and Bruni also point out that the Committee raised the issue of reprisals after the last regular review of Burundi in 2014. They reminded the Burundian Government that reprisals contravene Article 13 of the Convention against Torture, to which the country has been a party since 1993. Article 13 states that complainants and witnesses should be protected against all ill-treatment or intimidation as a consequence of making a complaint or giving evidence.

Given the gravity of the cases detailed in their letter, Modvig and Bruni have asked for a reply from the Burundian authorities by 11 August and stressed that they remain available for any meeting with the Burundian ambassador before then.

The Committee is due to publish its findings on Burundi on 12 August.

Members of the CAT are independent human rights experts drawn from around the world, who serve in their personal capacity and not as representatives of States parties. The Committee’s concluding observations are an independent assessment of States’ compliance with their human rights obligations under the treaty.

Photo: Phil Moore/IRIN

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.