October 25, 2020 05:35 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Former Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis tests Covid-19 positive, in isolation | NSCN (K-Nikki) cadre nabbed in Kohima | Weeks after Nabanna Abhiyan, West Bengal BJP dissolves BJYM district committees | Kashmir: Security forces launch CASO in Sopore | India's Covid-19 tally crosses 78-lakh mark with over 53,000 cases in 24 hours
Prosecutor to appeal UN tribunal's acquittal of Vojislav Šešelj of war crimes in the Balkans

Prosecutor to appeal UN tribunal's acquittal of Vojislav Šešelj of war crimes in the Balkans

India Blooms News Service | | 07 Apr 2016, 08:01 am
New York, Apr 7 (Just Earth News/IBNS): The long-serving Prosecutor of the United Nations tribunal for the former Yugoslavia on Wednesday announced that he will appeal The Hague-based court's recent acquittal of Serbian politician Vojislav Šešelj on war crimes charges in connection with actions committed by Serbian forces between August 1991 and September 1993.

Serge Brammertz, who is also serving as the Prosecutor of the International Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals – the body that will oversee the residual functions of the UN war crimes tribunals for the former Yugoslavia, known by the acronym ICTY, as well as for Rwanda (ICTR) – said he had come to the decision after reviewing the written reasons given by the Trial Chamber Majority for acquitting  Šešelj. That verdict was announced on 31 March.

“Given the far reaching nature of the errors we have identified in the Majority Judgement, we underscore for the victims of the crimes that the forthcoming appeal is of utmost priority for this Office,” said  Brammertz, adding that his Office considers “there has been a fundamental failure by the Majority to perform its judicial function.”

Among others, his Office noted that in its view, the Majority has omitted to properly adjudicate core aspects of the Prosecution's case, including by: failing to consider large parts of the evidentiary record; failing to provide proper reasons for its conclusions; failing to properly apply the 'beyond reasonable doubt' standard; and failing to consider the charges against  Šešelj in light of the pervasive pattern of crimes proved.

“At the same time, we consider that the Majority unreasonably allowed for the possibility that criminal conduct was simply a lawful contribution to the war effort, despite the overwhelming body of evidence pointing against it,” said  Brammertz, noting a “sweeping disregard” of the large number of crimes proved at trial had lead the Majority to conclude “that there was no widespread or systematic attack against the civilian population in parts of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina as required for crimes against humanity.”

Brammertz said that his Office would exert maximum effort to ensure the appeal in the Vojislav Šešelj case is litigated efficiently, effectively and fairly in accordance with the prescribed appeals process of the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals.

Photo: ICTY