May 28, 2024 08:42 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bibhav Kumar's bail, if granted, will be a death threat for me and my family: Swati Maliwal to Delhi HC | Now we don't trust Gujarat govt: High Court raps State and local body over Rajkot gaming zone fire incident | Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal requests Supreme Court to extend his interim relief by 7 days in liquor policy case | Cyclone Remal leaves trail of destruction in West Bengal, claims 2 lives, downpour continues | 'Man-made disaster': Gujarat High Court takes suo motu cognizance of Rajkot gaming zone fire that killed 27 people
Arvind Kejrwal moves Supreme Court after High Court setback in Delhi liquor policy case
Photo courtesy: UNI

Arvind Kejrwal moves Supreme Court after High Court setback in Delhi liquor policy case

| @indiablooms | 10 Apr 2024, 10:17 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal will on Wednesday move the Supreme Court, a day after the Delhi High Court dismissed the plea challenging his arrest in connection with the liquor policy case, media reports said.

The legal counsel of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)- headed by Kejriwal- will raise the matter in the top court at 10:30 am. It will seek an urgent hearing on the matter.

A single-judge bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the high court held that ED has provided enough evidence that Kejriwal received funds as kickbacks during the Goa elections.

"The ED has placed enough material, statements of approvers and AAP's candidate stating that Kejriwal was given money for Goa elections," the court said.

It said that the ED probe reveals that Kejriwal conspired and formulated a new excise policy and used proceeds of crime for party expenses.

The HC held that Kejriwal is allegedly involved in a personal capacity in the formulation of policy and demanding kickbacks and is accountable in the capacity of national convenor of his party AAP.

"The arrest of Kejriwal is not in contravention of law and so the remand cannot be termed illegal," the court observed while rejecting his plea.

A single bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said: "There is no separate law for the common man or the Chief Minister. There is no special privilege for Arvind Kejriwal. The approver's statement cannot be questioned. To doubt the approver is to doubt the judge as it was recorded in the court."

The probe is irrespective of election timings, the court held and said: "The Chief Minister cannot decide how the probe has to be done. The probe is not as per accused convenience."

Kejriwal and the AAP have alleged the arrest was timed for just before the Lok Sabha election to sideline the party's senior-most leaders, including the Chief Minister, and disrupt campaign plans.

Kejriwal's arrest was therefore ruled valid and his plea was dismissed. The court upheld its earlier remand orders - which sent him to the ED's custody and then to Delhi's Tihar Jail till April 15.

Kejriwal is the first sitting Chief Minister to be taken into custody.

Last week his lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi said the allegations are based on the statements of the approvers who were pressured to speak against the Delhi Chief Minister. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.