May 29, 2024 04:40 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Rajkot fire: Gaming zone co-owner among those killed, police confirms today | Eyeing more seats in Bengal, PM Modi holds mega roadshow in north Kolkata | 'I am not against minorities but won't divide the country based on religion': PM Modi | Delhi LG VK Saxena takes swipe at Kejriwal over children's hospital fire, orders anti-corruption probe | Punjab minister Balkar Singh's obscene video surfaces, BJP calls AAP 'Anti Aurat Party'
Supreme Court stays defamation proceedings against India Today journalists
Defamation
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court stays defamation proceedings against India Today journalists

| @indiablooms | 02 Apr 2024, 12:07 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the order of the Karnataka High Court which refused to stay the criminal defamation proceedings against India Today group editor Aroon Purie and journalists Rajdeep Sardesai and Shiv Aroor over a sting operation aired by the media outlet in 2016 on an alleged cash-for-votes scam.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra, while staying the defamation proceedings against the three journalists, sought the response of the Karnataka government.

The news published by India Today indicated that certain MPs in Karnataka were being bribed in exchange for votes ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections in 2016.

Former state legislator BR Patil, who was among the legislators accused of improprieties in the sting operation report, filed a criminal defamation case against Arun Poorie, Rajdeep Sardesai, and Shiv Aroor the same year.

In December 2023, the Karnataka High Court refused to stay the defamation proceedings against the senior journalists.

On December 18, High Court Judge R Nataraj passed his judgment, noting that the accused India Today show had telecast "doctored graphics" and made derogatory remarks against BR Patil.

The High Court concluded that the offense of making a false electronic record to harm the complainant's reputation, which is punishable under Section 469 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), was made out.

These allegations required further investigation, the High Court had said but refused to quash the case.

The High Court order was challenged before the Supreme Court.

Senior Advocate Dr S Muralidhar appeared for all three journalists accused in the defamation case.

The Supreme Court, while staying the Defamation proceedings, sent a notice to the Karnataka Government and asked them to reply by July.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.