April 26, 2024 13:32 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Justice MB Snehalatha takes oath as additional judge of Kerala High Court | NIA arrests key accused in pro-Khalistani attack on Indian Mission in London | Plea filed in Calcutta HC seeking action against Mamata Banerjee's 'judges purchased' remark | LS polls: 88 seats across 13 states, UTs going to polls tomorrow for phase 2; 1202 candidates in fray | 'Neither shocked nor surprised': Mallikarjun Kharge writes open letter to PM Modi over Congress manifesto row
No coercive action against pvt companies who failed to pay wages during lockdown period: SC

No coercive action against pvt companies who failed to pay wages during lockdown period: SC

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 12 Jun 2020, 05:06 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The private companies who did not pay wages during the lockdown period cannot be subjected to coercive action till the end of July, the Supreme Court said Friday, said media reports.

The apex court said the states must facilitate negotiations between the employers and employees over the payment of wages and submit a report in the concerned labour commissioners, said an NDTV report.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has given the Centre four more weeks to reply on the legality of its March 29 notification that had ordered mandatory payment of full wages during the lockdown period.

The notice was issued by the Union Home Ministry ordering all the private companies to pay the salaries without any deductions while their establishments were under closure during the lockdown period.

"It cannot be disputed that the industry and labourers need each other. Efforts should be made to sort out disputes regarding payment of wages for 50 days," a bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MR Shah said while passing the orders, the NDTV report said.

While issuing the order today, the Supreme court said the workers who are willing to work should be allowed to continue despite the dispute on wages.

The report said the Supreme Court has posted 18 petitions filed against the March 29 notification.

The petitioners have blamed the government of issuing the order "without due care and deliberation on the financial implications for the employers".

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.