April 26, 2024 23:16 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court rejects plea seeking 100 pct votes verification on EVMs, rules out returning to ballot papers | Voting concludes in 88 constituencies with 61% turnout by 5 pm | Justice MB Snehalatha takes oath as additional judge of Kerala High Court | NIA arrests key accused in pro-Khalistani attack on Indian Mission in London | Plea filed in Calcutta HC seeking action against Mamata Banerjee's 'judges purchased' remark
Calcutta HC stays the Customs summon to TMC MP Abhisekh's wife Ruchika

Calcutta HC stays the Customs summon to TMC MP Abhisekh's wife Ruchika

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 08 Apr 2019, 01:13 pm

Kolkata, Apr 8 (UNI) A two-judge bench of Calcutta High Court today stayed the summon the Customs issued to Ruchika Naroola, wife of TMC MP Abhisekh Banerjee and asked her to file her appeal before a trial bench of the high court.

The bench comprising Justice I P Mukherjee and Justice Mohammed Nizamuddin issued the ruling after Banerjee’s wife moved an appeal before the bench against a single bench order asking her appeal before customs on April 8.

The court said the customs could not send her summon till July this year.
The bench also directed her to file an affidavit before the trial court stating her stance and why she had challenged the summon of the customs.

Senior counsel Ahin Chowdhury appeared for the Banerjee’s wife.
On Thursday, Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj of the high court directed Naroola to appear before a customs officer on April 8.

The judge also asked the customs authorities not to take any coercive measure when Naroola meets the assistant customs commissioner. The order followed a plea by Naroola seeking quashing of the notice.

The customs counsel, Ravi Prakash, claimed before the single judge bench that Naroola had been summoned as many “discrepancies” were found in her documents after her arrival in Calcutta on a Thai Airways flight on March 16.
Naroola’s advocate S N Mukherjee had contested the legality of the notice and said his client should get protection from the court.

“Since the police have been conducting an inquiry on the basis of an FIR by the customs, they do not have the right to conduct a parallel probe,” he said.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.