April 29, 2024 11:16 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Not joining any other party': Arvinder Singh Lovely after resigning as Delhi Congress chief | Bus carrying 36 people erupts in flames in Mumbai-Pune Expressway, all passengers safe | Amid Congress' Amethi indecision, Robert Vadra says 'Entire country wants me to join politics' | Arrested Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal's wife Sunita Kejriwal gets major role in AAP | Two CRPF personnel killed in suspected attack by Kuki militants in Manipur
Yashwant Sinha, Shourie,Prashant Bhushan move SC seeking review of Rafale verdict

Yashwant Sinha, Shourie,Prashant Bhushan move SC seeking review of Rafale verdict

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 02 Jan 2019, 07:31 am

New Delhi, Jan 2 (IBNS) : Former ministers Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie, along with advocate Prashant Bhushan, have moved  the Supreme Court seeking a review of its December 14 verdict in Rafale case that gave the government a clean chit over the allegation of corruption, media reports said.

The plea alleges that the Rafale verdict relies upon "patently incorrect claims" made by the Centre in an unsigned note submitted in the Supreme Court. They also sought that the plea be heard in an open court.

The Supreme Court had earlier ruled that there was no reason to doubt the decision-making process behind the Rafale jet deal, thus absolving the government of the charge levelled by the Congress and few other individuals that there was an overpriced deal for the purchase of 56 Rafale jets from France involving Rs 59,000 crore. It was alleged that the deal was struck between Anil Ambani's company and the French jet-maker Dassault.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi had held that “broadly the processes have been followed” and that India cannot remain unprepared in skies when its adversaries have acquired the most modern fighter planes.

“We are satisfied that there is no occasion to really doubt the process, and even if minor deviations have occurred, that would not result in either setting aside the contract or requiring a detailed scrutiny by the court,” the bench, which also comprised Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph, said.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.