May 02, 2024 13:52 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Prajwal Revanna's 'sex scandal': Lookout notice issued against Deve Gowda's grandson | AAP MP Swati Maliwal reacts to Delhi Lt. Guv's sacking of 223 women's commission employees | Delhi Lt. Guv sacks 223 employees of women's commission in major step against AAP govt appointments | Lok Sabha polls: Mallikarjun Kharge likely to announce Congress' Rae Bareli and Amethi candidates today | Mamata Banerjee questions EC's revised poll figures, says 'How did this go up?'
Supreme Court rejects urgent hearing plea of Ayodhya case

Supreme Court rejects urgent hearing plea of Ayodhya case

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 12 Nov 2018, 06:22 am

New Delhi, Nov 12 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a plea seeking an urgent hearing of the case, which pertains to whether Ram temple can be built in the disputed land of Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya, saying the matter will be taken up only in January as it was decided, media reports said.

In reply to the petition, which was filed by the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said as he has been quoted by NDTV, "We have already passed the order. The appeals are coming up in January. Permission declined."

On Oct 29, the top court said the hearing dates will be announced by a suitable bench excluding CJI Gogoi in January. It will hear pleas challenging Allahabad High Court's verdict which divided 2.77-acre disputed Ayodhya land among Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara.

The apex court will decide whether Ram temple can be built in the same disputed land, where Babri Masjid was held till 1992.

In 1992, the Babri Masjid was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born at that land.

The verdict, if passed prior to 2019 General Elections, will boost up the BJP, whose political commitment was building the Ram temple in Ayodhya.

On Sept 27, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.