May 18, 2024 17:42 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Adhir Chowdhury won't decide, he will be axed if he doesn't...': Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge on alliance with Mamata Banerjee | Swati Maliwal assault case: Arvind Kejriwal's aide Bibhav Kumar arrested by Delhi Police | DK Shivakumar offered me Rs. 100 crore to defame Modi: Arrested BJP leader G Devaraje Gowda on Karnataka sex scandal | Swati Maliwal assault case: New video shows AAP MP escorted out of Arvind Kejriwal's home | Congress LS candidate Kanhaiya Kumar assaulted during election campaign in Delhi
Supreme Court quashes all cases against wink girl Priya Prakash Varrier

Supreme Court quashes all cases against wink girl Priya Prakash Varrier

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 31 Aug 2018, 08:56 am

New Delhi, Aug 31 (IBNS) :  The Supreme Court on Friday quashed all police complaints against teenage South-Indian actor Priya Prakash Varrier, the "wink girl", for hurting religious sentiments in her upcoming film, media reports said.

It was alleged that a song that has Varrier winking  in her upcoming film hurts religious sentiments.

It added that the song has no malicious intention and doesn’t outrage religious sentiment in any way. The song scene in which Varrier winks went viral on the social media.

The court also declared that no further complaints against the actor or the makers of Oru Adaar Love shall be entertained under IPC’s Section 295A that penalises all acts intending to insult religious groups.
"Somebody in a film sings a song and you have no other job but to file a case," NDTV quoted Chief Justice Dipak Misra as saying.

Referring to a constitution bench judgement and a verdict delivered in a similar case lodged against cricketer M S Dhoni, the apex court said no offence under Section 295 A of the IPC is made out against the 18-year-old actor and others in the present case. Section 295 A of IPC deals with deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.

Concluding that the FIRs were baseless and were filed just to grab attention, the court said: “Even if it’s (winking scene) true, it does not come within the ambit and sweep of section 295A. We do not perceive any calculated tendency adopted by the petitioners to insult or disturb the public order or invite the wrath of section 295A,” reports Hindustan Times.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.