May 02, 2024 02:52 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Mamata Banerjee questions EC's revised poll figures, says 'How did this go up?' | Gangster Goldy Brar, mastermind in Sidhu Moosewala's murder; shot dead in US: Reports | Viral video shows SRK sharing fun banter with son AbRam at IPL match | After Supreme Court order, Election Commission revises protocols to handle EVM units | 'Make us win or will cut electricity in your area': Karnataka Congress MLA threatens voters
Supreme Court dismisses PILs seeking independent probe in Justice Loya's death

Supreme Court dismisses PILs seeking independent probe in Justice Loya's death

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 19 Apr 2018, 11:12 am

New Delhi, Apr 19 (IBNS): The Supreme Court has dismissed all Public Interest Litigations (PILs) seeking an independent probe in the death of Justice BH Loya, media reports said.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra, said the "petitions are scandalous and amount to criminal contempt".

Loya died due to heart attack when he was hearing Sohrabuddin Sheikh murder case in which Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) national president Amit Shah was accused.

The judge who replaced Loya acquitted Shah of all charges citing lack of evidences.

The death of the judge came into the light after The Caravan magazine published an interview in which Loya’s sister Anuradha Biyani, and father Harikrishan alleged a foul play.

The publication cites various alleged manipulations in records on the night of Loya’s death.

However, Justice Loya’s son Anuj rubbished the report, saying that he was convinced that his father died of a heart attack.

He also said that his family does not have any doubt about the “integrity of investigative agencies”.

The petitions turned out to be interesting as the four senior judges of the top court- Justices Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph- months ago alleged that cases with far reaching consequences were assigned to selective judges.

Justice Chelameswar, who represented the four judges in an unprecedented press conference, said they had approached the CJI with a letter but failed to convince him.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.