May 04, 2024 11:55 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Delhi Police arrest 'Spirit Of Congress' administrator in Amit Shah video case | 'Rohith Vemula not Dalit,' cops file closure report, give clean chit to all accused | Canada Police arrest suspects in Hardeep Singh Nijjar's murder: Report | 'Mother entrusted me with the responsibility,' Rahul says facing flak on Rae Bareli nomination | Lok Sabha polls: Rahul Gandhi files nomination from Rae Bareli

"PM Modi should discuss alternative methods to get Turkmenistan natural gas"

By Amit Bhandari/IBNS | | 07 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
On 6 July 2015, Prime Minister Modi commenced his visit to five Central Asian republics. His tour has begun with visits to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, after which he will attend the BRICS and SCO summits in Russia. Following the summit, he will continue his tour to Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Energy security will be the key theme for his visits.

India is scaling-up its nuclear power projects, even as countries such as Japan and Germany have shut down, or are preparing to shut down, nuclear power plants. India aims to increase its share of electricity generated through nuclear energy from 3.5% to 25% by 2050, but it has insufficient reserves of uranium. It requires stable supplies of the fuel from countries such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Russia, with whom it has signed deals for supplying uranium.

Pipeline agreements, on the other hand, are more complex. The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline project, which was expected to bring natural gas from Turkmenistan to Afghanistan, Pakistan and India, has stalled due to India-Pakistan border disputes. Until these disputes are resolved, it is unlikely that the TAPI pipeline project will materialise.

It is necessary for Prime Minister Modi to discuss alternative methods for India to receive natural gas from Turkemenistan. Bringing Turkmenistan’s gas to a port through a pipeline via Iran and then shipping it to India as LNG is only possible when economic sanctions on Iran are lifted. 

 
However, this will be a more expensive route because in addition to setting up pipelines, investments will also be needed to set up LNG terminals and for shipping. Such a project would be counterproductive for Iran – it has the world’s second largest gas reserves and can emerge as a major supplier if sanctions are lifted. Iran’s gas reserves are located in more accessible regions and will likely get to the market before gas from Turkmenistan.

On the renewable energy front, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan have significant hydropower potential but insufficient local demand. India can benefit from hydropower imports from these two countries, using a model similar to its partnership with Bhutan – funding hydropower projects and then buying the electricity. 
 
However, India does not have a physical border with either Tajikistan or Kyrgyzstan and so power will require transit via Pakistan, putting such a project in the same predicament as TAPI.”

(Amit Bhandari is a fellow for energy and environment studies at foreign policy think tank group Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.