April 27, 2024 04:40 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
6.1 magnitude earthquake hits Taiwan, no immediate damages reported | Arjuna awardee CRPF officer found guilty of sexual harassment charges, faces dismissal | Opposition's dreams shattered: PM Modi on Supreme Court's VVPAT verdict | Supreme Court rejects plea seeking 100 pct votes verification on EVMs, rules out returning to ballot papers | Voting concludes in 88 constituencies with 61% turnout by 5 pm
Judge Vijay Vishnoi recuses from hearing Salman Khan Arms Act case

Judge Vijay Vishnoi recuses from hearing Salman Khan Arms Act case

India Blooms News Service | | 19 May 2015, 07:56 pm
New Delhi, May 19 (IBNS): The judge hearing the Arms Act case against Bollywood actor Salman Khan has recused himself, reports said on Tuesday.

Judge Vijay Vishnoi has refused to hear the case. He has conveyed his decision to the Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court.

The Chief justice will now have to appoint a new judge in the case.

Earlier this month, the Jodhpur court has rejected Khan's plea for witness re-examination in connection with the 1998 blackbuck poaching case. 

The case has been booked against Khan under the Arms Act as the licenses of his weapons were found to have been expired.

On April 29, Khan pleaded 'not guilty' before the court.

He had filed for re-examination of five witnesses in the case. 

Salman Khan and a few other Bollywood actors  were accused of poaching blackbucks, and endangered species, on the midnight of Oct 1-2, 1998 during the shooting of a movie "Hum Saath Saath Hain".

Two blackbucks, were killed on the outskirts of Kankani village near Jodhpur.

Khan is accused of carrying and using illegal arms. 

Earlier this month, a session court convicted and sentenced him to jail for five years in connection with the 2002 incident in which his SUV mounted over pavement and ploughed through several persons, killing one and injuring four others. 

The court found him guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and held him responsible for drunken driving without having a valid license.

Later, the Bombay High Court suspended his five-year jail sentence and asked him  to apply for bail with a bond of Rs. 30,000.




Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.