April 26, 2026 04:09 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
YouTuber Saleem Wastik arrested in connection with 1995 kidnapping and murder case | Maharashtra Police makes first arrest months after Akshay Kumar revealed daughter’s cyber harassment | Big political shake-up: KCR’s daughter Kavitha floats new TRS after BRS fallout | ED raids multiple Bengal locations in PDS scam probe amid assembly polls | Bengal polls: Mob attacks central forces, 3 CAPF personnel injured in Birbhum | ‘People voting to protect their rights’: Mamata says high turnout backs TMC in Bengal | ‘Fear is being defeated’: PM Modi says high voter turnout signals BJP win in Bengal | Crude bomb attack in Murshidabad’s Nowda as violence hits Bengal polling | ‘Mamata Banerjee’s politics fuelled BJP growth in Bengal’: Rahul Gandhi | 'Will never forget’: Nation remembers Pahalgam victims as leaders vow strong fight against terror
Imran Khan
Image: Wallpaper Cave

Pakistan: Imran Khan govt files plea against SC order on NA

| @indiablooms | Apr 09, 2022, at 11:33 pm

Islamabad: Ahead of the voting on no-confidence motion, Prime Minister Imran Khan's government on Saturday filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's decision to restore the National Assembly session.

According to The Express Tribune, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) prayed, "SC may review, recall and set aside the Impugned Order dated 07.04.2022 passed in the captioned cases which are based on errors floating on the surface, therefore, the impugned order may kindly be recalled and the captioned causes be dismissed/discharged".

The government further said that the 'impugned order be suspended' for the time being.

The review petition stated that the order, in the absence of any detailed reasons, is not a judicial determination in the context of Article 184(3) read with Article 189 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, The Express Tribune reported.

It said, "In the absence of the determination in the stated Presidential Reference, the impugned order has prejudiced the proceedings of the Presidential Reference and has blemished the entire proceedings directed to be held on 09.04.2022 without any determination therein."

The petitioner pointed out that the SC has "erred to appreciate that within the proceedings of the house, the Parliament are sovereign, independent and are not amenable to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court or any other Court.

The impugned Order is in complete violation of the law laid down through all the prior judgments on the subject as referred before the Honourable Bench hearing these causes."

Earlier, the SC had termed the dissolution of Assembly null and void and said, "In consequence of the foregoing, it is declared that at all material times the Prime Minister was under the bar imposed by the Explanation to clause (1) of Article 58 of the Constitution and continues to remain so restricted. He could not, therefore, have at any time advised the President to dissolve the Assembly as contemplated by clause (1) of Article 58." The Supreme Court also "declared that the assembly was in existence at all times, and continues to remain and be so".

(With UNI inputs)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.