September 09, 2026 08:49 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Eiffel Tower staff strike after female workers 'sidelined' during Hindu group visit | ‘When will character assassination of women stop?’ Kangana Ranaut amid Udhayanidhi-Trisha row | 11 arms instead of 10! Suvendu Adhikari apologises over Durga image in Bengal govt ad amid Bageshwar Baba row | ‘Meat is core to Shakta Hinduism’: PM Modi adviser hits back at Bageshwar Baba over non-veg ban appeal | ‘No one can dictate what Bengalis eat’: BJP’s blunt message amid Bageshwar Baba’s Durga Puja food row | Delhi hostel collapse: Owner detained after seven die in Satya Niketan tragedy | No Muslims, Aadhaar card and tilak mandatory: VHP lays down rules for Garba, Dandiya in Maharashtra | 'No non-veg near Durga Puja pandals': Bageshwar Baba's big Bengal appeal sparks controversy | 'Law will take its action': Vijay's zero tolerance on insulting women weeks after Udhayanidhi's arrest | Delhi Metro's big warning to content creators: Don't try this viral stunt or face action
Palestine
Palestinian Vice President Hussein Al-Sheikh says the E1 project is an existential threat to Palestinian territorial contiguity. Photo: husseinalsheikh.com

Canada, France and UK move to ban settlement imports in a bid to stop Israel's two-state solution

| @indiablooms | Sep 09, 2026, at 06:38 am

Ottawa: Canada, France and the United Kingdom announced a coordinated crackdown on Israeli settlement activity on Tuesday, moving to ban the importation of goods produced in West Bank settlements and impose targeted measures against those who facilitate or profit from them.

In a joint statement, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Andy Burnham said settlement expansion, including the Israeli government's decision to advance the E1 settlement project, combined with a sharp rise in settler violence, now poses "a direct and urgent threat" to the prospects for a two-state solution.

"The time has come"

The three leaders framed the move as a natural next step after recognising the State of Palestine a year earlier. Reiterating that settlements are illegal under international law, they said further action was necessary to protect the two-state vision, their national interests, and their values, adding that the moment had arrived to act "before it is too late."

The E1 area, a roughly 4.5-square-mile tract of land east of Jerusalem, has long been one of the most contentious flashpoints in the conflict; Israeli development there is widely seen as capable of severing the West Bank in two and cutting off Palestinian access to East Jerusalem.

A wider coalition 

The announcement was not limited to the three leaders' countries. A separate joint statement from foreign ministers indicated that Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK, twelve nations in total, are either introducing national restrictions on trade with illegal settlements, supporting equivalent European Union measures, or actively considering further steps.

That statement also reaffirmed recognition of Israel's security concerns and condemned the October 7 Hamas attack, while calling on the Israeli government to immediately halt settlement expansion, ensure accountability for settler violence, and investigate allegations against Israeli security forces.

Balancing pressure with support for Israel

Despite the new measures, the three leaders were careful to stress that their relationship with Israel remains intact.

The statement reaffirmed a desire for a "close and productive partnership" with Israel, enduring support for the Israeli people, and an unwavering commitment to Israel's security, describing the goal as a safe and secure Israel existing alongside a safe and secure Palestine.

The move drew a cautious reaction from the United States. The issue reportedly came up in a call between Burnham and President Donald Trump earlier in the week.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio declined to endorse the approach when asked about it, saying only that Washington shares "the goal of stability" in the region and does not want to see anything destabilising unfold in the West Bank given the broader tensions already gripping the region. 

Rubio stopped short of criticising the announcement directly but made clear the U.S. would not be following suit.

The Palestinian Authority welcomed the coordinated move but argued it does not go far enough.

Palestinian Vice President Hussein Al-Sheikh said Tuesday that what's needed now is a shift from condemnation toward binding, decisive measures capable of actually halting settlement expansion and the de facto annexation of West Bank land, along with real enforcement of international law and UN Security Council resolutions, and accountability for settler violence.

Al-Sheikh singled out the E1 project as an existential threat to Palestinian territorial contiguity, warning that it risks fragmenting Palestinian land and severing the northern West Bank from the south, undermining any realistic prospect of a viable, connected Palestinian state.

He argued that genuinely protecting the two-state solution requires shielding Palestinian territory from annexation, settlement expansion and settler violence, ending the occupation outright, and translating international law into concrete action that secures both regional and international stability.

Next steps at the UN

The three leaders said they would co-chair a meeting at the United Nations General Assembly later this month to build on the announcement and continue pushing for a negotiated peace. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.