April 17, 2026 11:30 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls | 'Black law': Stalin burns copy of 'delimitation' bill, slams Modi govt | TCS halts Nashik BPO operations amid sexual abuse, conversion allegations | ‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | Historic shift: Bihar gets first BJP CM as Samrat Choudhary takes oath | 'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping
UK doctor struck off after misconduct case involving veil incident and suspension rule violations.
UK
Dr. Keith Wolverson. Photo: X/@TheGriftReport

UK doctor, suspended for asking Muslim patient to remove veil, is struck off the medical register

| @indiablooms | Apr 16, 2026, at 07:53 pm

London/IBNS: A UK-based doctor, Keith Wolverson, has been struck off the medical register following findings of professional misconduct linked to multiple incidents, including a consultation involving a Muslim patient.

The decision follows a series of tribunal hearings examining his conduct while working as a locum doctor in urgent care centres.

One of the key incidents occurred in May 2018 at Royal Stoke University Hospital, where Wolverson asked a patient to remove her niqab multiple times during a consultation.

The patient initially declined, citing religious reasons, but later complied after repeated requests.

The doctor stated that the request was made to assist communication, claiming difficulty in understanding her speech.

However, the tribunal found that the patient spoke fluent English and determined that the explanation provided was not accurate.

The patient later reported feeling discriminated against following the encounter.

The tribunal also examined other aspects of Wolverson’s conduct, including recorded comments regarding the English-speaking abilities of several patients and their relatives.

These remarks were deemed inappropriate during the proceedings.

It was further noted that the doctor did not engage with the patient’s husband during the consultation, citing concerns over his behaviour.

Breach of suspension conditions

Wolverson was suspended in 2022 for nine months after being found guilty of misconduct.

However, it later emerged that he continued to undertake locum work during the suspension period, contrary to regulatory instructions.

His failure to attend subsequent hearings and comply with tribunal requirements led to further scrutiny of his actions.

Tribunal findings and final decision

During a later review, Wolverson stated that he had reflected on his conduct and expressed regret.

The tribunal initially imposed conditions on his practice rather than extending the suspension, allowing him to return to work under supervision.

Subsequent proceedings found that he had disengaged from the regulatory process and failed to meet required standards.

The tribunal concluded that his actions posed an ongoing risk to public safety.

The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service ruled that removal from the medical register was necessary, stating that lesser sanctions would not adequately address the seriousness of the misconduct.

The decision to strike off Wolverson brings the case to a close, following multiple hearings and findings related to professional conduct and regulatory compliance.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.