September 24, 2026 01:04 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
ECI breaks silence on SIR row: Poll body says all decisions were ‘unanimous’ despite differences | Gyanesh Kumar under fire: Opposition seeks CEC’s removal as SIR row explodes over report of 14 internal ECI objections | SIR row explodes: Report claims 14 objections by 2 Election Commissioners; Opposition demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's removal | IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla sent on leave amid Sahil Wakode death controversy: Report | Narendra Modi's Canada visit confirmed: Carney eyes trade deal by year-end | 'When we win, we're tearing this down': MAGA activist's threat to 90-foot Hanuman statue in US sparks backlash | Delhi women's safety under spotlight: 17-year-old allegedly gang-raped near Kalkaji Mandir in fourth such incident in 10 days | India gets fresh push for permanent UNSC seat as 4 European nations back bid | IIT Bombay professor gets faculty backing after student death controversy; protests intensify over suspension | IIT Bombay protests erupt after student’s death; authorities meet students over 18 demands
Electoral Bonds
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court strikes down electoral bonds scheme, calls it 'unconstitutional'

| @indiablooms | Feb 15, 2024, at 05:09 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a landmark verdict months ahead of the Lok Sabha elections, the Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the electoral bonds scheme calling it "unconstitutional", media reports said.

The top court said the scheme violates the Right to Information and Section 19(1)(a).

"The Electoral bonds scheme has to be struck down as unconstitutional. It violates the right to information of citizens, about possible quid pro quo," the court remarked as quoted by NDTV.

The scheme, which was introduced during the Union Budget 2017-18, is a way to fund political parties in India.

In its order, the Supreme Court acknowledged that not all donations to political parties are made to change public policies as students and daily wagers contribute too.

However, the court said the contributions made by companies are "purely business transactions" and have greater influence on political processes.

The top court said as quoted by NDTV, "Before amendment, loss making companies were not able to contribute. The amendment does not recognize the harm of allowing loss-making companies to contribute due to quid pro quo.

"The amendment to Section 182 Companies Act is manifestly arbitrary for not making distinction between loss making and profit making companies."

Ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the primary opposition party Congress had promised to quash electoral bonds if the party was voted to power.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.