September 17, 2026 11:51 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi
Live-In
Representational Photo: ChatGPT

'Had a child together, now alleges rape': SC says consensual live-in breakup is not a crime

| @indiablooms | Apr 27, 2026, at 03:45 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court of India on Monday flagged the complexities and risks associated with live-in relationships, observing that walking out of such arrangements does not amount to a criminal offence, according to media reports.

Court Questions Criminalisation of Consensual Relationships

The top court made the observation while hearing a petition in which a woman accused a man—her live-in partner—of rape and assault on the alleged false promise of marriage.

Justice B. V. Nagarathna questioned how a consensual relationship could later translate into allegations of sexual assault, underlining the distinction between marriage and live-in arrangements.

‘Where Is the Question of Offence?’

Raising critical questions, Justice Nagarathna said: “This is a live-in relationship. She went on to have a child with the man without marriage, and now she is saying rape and assault. What is this?”

“Where is the question of offence when there is a consensual relationship?”

The judge acknowledged that such remarks are often seen as “victim-shaming” but emphasised the legal complexities involved.

‘Vagaries of Relationships Outside Marriage’

Highlighting patterns seen in similar cases, the court observed: “For years, they lived together. When they split up, the lady files a complaint against the man for sexual assault. These are all the vagaries of relationships outside marriage.”

Petitioner’s Claims and Court’s Response

The petitioner’s counsel argued that the accused had met the woman when she was 18 and had allegedly promised to marry her.

The counsel also claimed the woman was unaware that the man already had four wives.

Justice Nagarathna, however, questioned why the complainant chose to continue the relationship and have a child without marriage, despite such circumstances.

Maintenance Possible, Not Criminal Case

The court indicated that while the woman may seek maintenance for the child, the breakdown of a live-in relationship alone cannot be treated as grounds for a criminal offence like rape.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.