February 12, 2026 02:18 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh poll manifestos mirror India’s welfare schemes as BNP, Jamaat bet big on women, freebies | Drama ends: Pakistan makes U-turn on India boycott, to play T20 World Cup clash as per schedule | ‘Won’t allow any impediment in SIR’: Supreme Court pulls up Mamata govt over delay in sharing officers’ details | India-US trade deal: ‘Negotiations always two-way’, says Amul MD amid farmers’ concerns | Khamenei breaks 37-year-old ritual for first time amid escalating Iran-US tensions | India must push for energy independence amid global uncertainty: Vedanta chairman Anil Agarwal | Kanpur horror: Lamborghini driven by businessman’s son rams vehicles, injures six | ‘Namaste Trump beat Howdy Modi’: Congress slams PM Over India-US trade deal | Historic India-US trade pact: Tariffs cut, $500B market opportunity unlocked! | Big call from RBI: Repo rate stays at 5.25%, neutral stance continues
Nirmala Sitharaman slammed Rahul Gandhi over his 'sold Bharat Mata' remark. Photo: X/Facebook.

'It is Congress who sold nation': Nirmala Sitharaman slams Rahul Gandhi for 'sold Bharat Mata' remark

| @indiablooms | Feb 12, 2026, at 12:00 am

Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Wednesday launched a sharp attack on Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi over his “sold Bharat Mata” remark, accusing the Congress-led UPA government of compromising national interests during its tenure.

Replying to the debate on the Union Budget in the Lok Sabha, Sitharaman said it was the Congress, not the current government, that had “sold the country” and weakened India’s global standing.

“It is the Congress which sold the government, farmers, the poor and the nation. It was you who hyphenated India with Pakistan,” she said.

Referring to Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju’s remarks, she added, “Not a single person has been born till date who can sell India. And Prime Minister Narendra Modi will never do such a thing.”

Sharm el-Sheikh reference

The finance minister cited the 2009 Sharm el-Sheikh Joint Statement between then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart, Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani, accusing the UPA government of diluting India’s position on sovereignty and security in its engagement with Pakistan.

“Those who wanted to negotiate with Pakistan at Sharm el-Sheikh are now giving us suggestions on negotiations,” she said.

The Sharm el-Sheikh meeting took place seven months after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks.

At the time, Dr Singh had reiterated the need to bring the perpetrators of the attacks to justice.

The BJP has frequently criticised the UPA government for what it describes as a lack of a strong response following the attacks.

WTO ‘Peace Clause’ allegation

Sitharaman also alleged that India had compromised its interests during the 2013 World Trade Organization (WTO) meeting in Bali, Indonesia, held during the UPA’s tenure.

The Bali agreement included two major components — the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) and provisions related to public stockholding for food security.

The finance minister claimed the Congress government had weakened the country’s position, particularly on matters affecting farmers and the poor.

“It was the Congress which not only sold the interests of the poor and farmers of this country but the country itself,” she said.

The exchange marks the latest escalation in the ongoing war of words between the ruling BJP and the Congress during the Budget session of Parliament.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.