June 27, 2026 10:41 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Fresh paper leak rocks India: Maharashtra TET postponed a day before exam, over 4 lakh aspirants affected | Pune fort murder case: Siya Goyal's brother says family would have called off marriage if she had objected | Donald Trump gets a road named after him in India, says 'Thank You!' | Fresh setback for Gautam Adani? US judge asks DoJ to justify dropping criminal charges | Ram Mandir Trust chief Champat Rai resigns as alleged donation siphoning row escalates | Ram Mandir fund row deepens: 8 arrested days after BJP called allegations 'false narrative' | 'Who tied the hands of CBI?': Calcutta HC on RG Kar case; victim's mother, now BJP MLA, says she is 'deeply disturbed' | Construction comes to a standstill at nearly 700 Kolkata projects after Taratala warehouse tragedy kills 15 | World Cup shocker! Ecuador stun Germany 2-1, storm into Round of 32 | Iran-US conflict: Cargo vessel hit near Strait of Hormuz, UN agency pauses evacuation operations

Union Minister echoes Greenpeace's concerns on pesticide residue in tea

| | Aug 21, 2014, at 09:32 pm
New Delhi, Aug 21 (IBNS): Expressing serious concern on the issue of pesticides residue in tea, Union Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, in a recent media interview, raised questions on the safety of consumers.

Greenpeace India siad it urged the Indian tea companies not to hide behind regulations, but look towards real solutions of Non Pesticide Management (NPM) that can ensure consumers their right to safe tea.

In India pesticides are regulated by Central Insecticides Board and Registration Committee (CIBRC) and Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and the regulation has been proven to be in shambles.

“The registration of 248 pesticides by the CIBRC has no rationale, as this has been done without checking whether alternatives exist, while Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) are not set for all registered pesticides. Also, MRLs are not an indicator of safety as they are set for individual active ingredients and Greenpeace has found a cocktail of pesticides in more than half the samples tested," said Neha Saigal, Senior Campaigner, Greenpeace India.

The failure of the regulation has been further demonstrated in the tea sector with Greenpeace finding pesticides like Monocrotophos, Tebufenpyrad and Triazophos in tea samples; these pesticides are unapproved for use in tea. Greenpeace is, therefore, asking the tea companies to commit to a roadmap of gradual phase out of pesticides adopting an ecosystem based approach,” she said.

Earlier this month, two of the leading tea companies Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) and Girnar Tea came forward in support of NPM for tea after Greenpeace India released its report “Trouble Brewing”.

“The tea industry has taken cognizance of our report and acknowledged the issue of pesticides in tea. While we acknowledge the efforts made by companies like Tata Global Beverages Limited (TGBL), we hope they will adopt a new holistic approach which can lead to elimination and not reduction of pesticides. We urge the tea companies to take plantation owners and small tea growers along with them on this sustainable journey,” Saigal added further.

Recently International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements released a statement calling on the tea industry to save the tea industry and the right of consumers to safe tea.

Greenpeace said it will continue engaging with all stakeholders in the tea sector and facilitate movement towards a solution that will help the sector move out of the pesticide treadmill and ensure sustainable livelihoods for the farmers and safe tea for the consumers.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.