May 13, 2026 02:52 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Protests erupt in Delhi after NEET UG 2026 cancellation over alleged paper leak | AIADMK cracks widen after Tamil Nadu defeat; faction backs Vijay-led TVK government | Himanta Biswa Sarma takes oath as Assam CM for second term after BJP’s landslide win | Bengali rights activist Garga Chatterjee arrested over alleged provocative remarks ahead of assembly polls | No return to full WFH yet: IT firms unlikely to change hybrid work model despite PM Modi’s appeal | Suvendu Adhikari Cabinet clears BSF land transfer, census rollout, Ayushman Bharat in Bengal | Mamata govt's welfare schemes to continue: Bengal CM Suvendu Adhikari after first cabinet meeting | ‘One of life’s most emotional moments’: PM Modi performs grand Mahapuja at Somnath Temple | UPI trail cracks Suvendu Adhikari aide Chandranath Rath murder case; three arrested | Totally unacceptable: Trump rejects Iran’s peace plan in explosive showdown
Golden Dome
Trump announced constructing Golden Dome in his second tenure. Photo: White House

Trump’s Golden Dome shock: Missile shield price tag balloons to USD 1.2 trillion

| @indiablooms | May 13, 2026, at 02:39 pm

US President Donald Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” missile defence system is projected to cost approximately $1.2 trillion (£882 billion) to develop, deploy, and operate over the next two decades, according to a report released by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

The estimate is significantly higher than the initial projection of $175 billion (£129 billion).

“A national missile defence system possessing capabilities broadly consistent with those outlined in the executive order would cost about $1.2 trillion to develop, deploy, and operate for 20 years,” the report stated, noting that all costs are expressed in 2026 dollars.

Of the total projected cost, acquisition expenses alone would exceed $1 trillion, covering the system’s key components, including interceptor layers and a space-based missile warning and tracking system.

“That amount includes costs for the system’s major components—namely, the interceptor layers and a space-based missile warning and tracking system. It also includes costs for general, ongoing research and development and improvements in the system’s integration and performance,” the report added.

Trump unveiled the ambitious missile shield project shortly after returning to the White House, describing it as a necessary safeguard against “next-generation” aerial threats.

The CBO report identified the space-based interceptor layer as the most expensive part of the programme, accounting for nearly 70 percent of acquisition costs and 60 percent of total expenditure.

According to the assessment, the proposed system would be capable of fully countering an attack launched by a regional adversary with limited capabilities, such as North Korea, or a small-scale strike from near-peer rivals such as Russia or China.

However, the report warned that the system could be overwhelmed by a full-scale assault from a major military power.

Meanwhile, Russia has announced the successful test-firing of its RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), a nuclear-capable weapon widely described by Moscow as one of the most powerful missile systems ever developed.

According to the Kremlin’s official website, President Vladimir Putin hailed the launch as a major milestone, calling the Sarmat “the most powerful missile system in the world” and comparing it to the Soviet-era Voevoda missile currently in Russia’s arsenal.

Putin further claimed that the Sarmat’s total warhead yield is more than four times greater than that of any existing Western counterpart. Western defence analysts have nicknamed the missile “Satan 2.”

Military expert and air defence historian Yuri Knutov, speaking to Sputnik, said the missile’s defining capability is its ability to carry multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing each warhead to strike separate targets independently.

Knutov also argued that even advanced missile defence systems, including Trump’s proposed Golden Dome shield, could struggle to intercept warheads using suborbital trajectories and hypersonic manoeuvring capabilities, raising fresh questions about the effectiveness of next-generation missile defence architecture.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.