February 26, 2026 07:06 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'CBFC didn't apply mind': Kerala High Court stays Kerala Story 2 release | Operation Sindoor 2.0 will be stronger if India forced to launch: Top Army commander warns Pakistan | ‘Heads must roll!’ Supreme Court cracks down on NCERT textbook over judiciary chapter | ‘1.2 crore voters may be dropped’: Mamata Banerjee flags major concern over SIR list | India-US trade deal at risk? Trump imposes massive 126% duty on solar imports | ‘My life reflects this reality’: Shooter Tara Shahdeo recalls forced conversion amid Kerala Story 2 row | Modi begins Israel visit to boost defence, tech and strategic ties | Trump claims Pakistan PM told him he prevented 35 million deaths by stopping India-Pakistan conflict | Supreme Court's big move over Bengal SIR! Odisha, Jharkhand judicial officers allowed to complete revision process | ‘Kerala lives in harmony, film’s portrayal wrong’: Kerala High Court raps Kerala Story sequel makers

Independent rights expert speaks of 'anguish, stress and disempowerment' of poverty

| @indiablooms | Jul 08, 2020, at 09:27 am

New York: More than 70 million people are expected to fall into extreme poverty because of COVID-19, the UN Human Rights Council heard on Tuesday, as a leading rights expert slammed “greatly exaggerated” claims of global poverty eradication between 1990 and 2015.

Highlighting his predecessor Philip Alstom’s final report, UN-appointed independent Special Rapporteur Olivier de Schutter, insisted that without China’s “outsized contribution” in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty during that period, overall progress globally towards reversing the scourge, suddenly appeared far less impressive.

According to the World Bank’s international poverty line (IPL) – which is subsisting on $1.90 per day - the number of people in extreme poverty fell from 1.895 billion in 1990, to 736 million in 2015.

Statistical mismatch

But this includes the 750 million people in China living below the poverty line in 1990, who numbered just 10 million in 2015, the Special Rapporteur explained, before questioning the “very weak, unsatisfactory” World Bank measure of poverty.

“Leaving out China, the number of people living below the $2.50 USD per day would barely have changed throughout this period, and it would have increased by 140 million people in Sub-Saharan African and the Middle East”, Mr. de Schutter said.

In local currencies, $1.90 “translates to living on 7.49 yuan per day in China, 1.41 euros in Portugal, 22.49 pesos in Mexico, 50.83 roubles in Russia, 355.18 naira in Nigeria, 910.15 pesos in Chile, or 36.27 rupees in India”, he said. “The IPL is of course well below the national poverty lines of most countries, and accordingly generates dramatically lower numbers in poverty.”

Anguish and disempowerment

Highlighting calls to adopt a much more realistic measure of poverty than the IPL baseline amount, the Special Rapporteur noted that it could be based on meeting people’s basic needs – and particularly children’s - which the Council heard were twice as likely as adults to be living in poverty.
“If you speak to people in poverty and ask them about their experience of poverty, they will tell you about the anguish, the stress, the disempowerment, the discrimination and the social and institutional abuse”, he said, before urging Member States to focus less on economic growth as a means to reduce poverty, and more on the reduction of inequalities and the redistribution of wealth.

Turning to his predecessor’s report, he noted that “in the name of achieving growth, we have lowered corporate tax rates (from an average of 40 per cent in 1980 to 24 per cent in 2019)”.

In addition, States “have tolerated aggressive practices of tax avoidance by transnational corporations” which had cost States $650 billion per year, the Special Rapporteur’s findings suggested, in addition to deregulating labour markets and privatising public services, which had led to an increase in the cost to users.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.