September 29, 2026 05:27 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Vijay's TVK makes Bengal entry: First party office opens in Purba Bardhaman amid state's political shake-up | SRFTI clash erupts over ABGP event: Students allege assault; BJP calls it ‘ugly face of Leftists’ | 'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death

SC strikes down Section 66A of IT Act

| | Mar 24, 2015, at 04:50 pm
New Delhi, Mar 24 (IBNS): In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the Section 66A of IT Act.

The apex court hold the section violative of 19(1) A of the Constitution which guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression to citizens.

The verdict on the issue was pronounced by a bench of Justices J Chelameswar and Rohinton F Nariman.

Under this section, the police had the power to arrest people for posting objectionable content online.

In this case, a conviction can give a maximum of three years in jail.

The validity of the section was challenged by a law student Shreya Singal and others.

After the apex court pronounced its verdict, Shreya Singhal said: It a big victory...The judges have upheld the rights of the citizens today."

"It has been misused. One needs to remember that the law should be for the people," she said.

Another petitioner, Bangladeshi writer

Taslima Nasreen tweeted: "A censorship ruling by the Supreme Court today could change the way the internet works for you."

 

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.