May 19, 2026 12:25 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Big relief signal for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam? Supreme Court questions earlier bail denial | Left era ends in Kerala! V.D. Satheesan takes oath as CM after UDF’s massive comeback | Drone strike near UAE nuclear plant sparks panic—India calls it a ‘dangerous escalation' | Kathak to Garba: Indian diaspora stuns PM Modi with grand welcome in Amsterdam | ‘Geography or history’: Indian Army chief issues blunt warning to Pakistan over terror support | India, UAE ink key energy deals during Modi’s visit amid West Asia tensions | ‘There can be no better Bengal CM’: Mithun Chakraborty praises Suvendu Adhikari | PM Modi adviser Sanjeev Sanyal frontrunner for Bengal Finance Minister: Report | FIR against Abhishek Banerjee over ‘provocative speeches’ during West Bengal poll campaign | Madhya Pradesh High Court holds Bhojshala complex disputed site to be a temple
Image: Wikipedia/Bollywood Hungama

Rajinikanth's wife Latha to face trial in Rs. 6.20 cr fraud case: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jul 10, 2018, at 06:32 pm

New Delhi, July 10 (IBNS): Setting aside the Karnataka High Court's order, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said actor-politician Rajinikanth's wife Latha will have to face trial in a fraud case amounting to Rs. 6.20 cr, media reports said.

According to reports, Latha failed to clear the dues of Rs. 6.20 cr to advertising firm Ad Bureau.

A loan of Rs. 10 cr was taken from the advertising firm for the post-production work of Rajinikanth and Deepika Padukone starrer film Kochadaiiyaan, which released in 2014.

The firm had later alleged that Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd., in which Latha is the director, did not refund Rs. 6.20 cr.

Mediaone was about to pay Rs. 10 cr along with guaranteed profit of Rs. 1. 20 cr to the advertising firm.

The matter moved to the Karnataka High Court, which had cancelled all legal proceedings against Latha by stating the case is not about fraud but breach of agreement.

In February, the top court had asked Latha to pay the pending amount within three months.

Latha was pulled up by the apex court last week after she failed to clear the dues within the fixed time frame.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.