May 18, 2026 03:33 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Big relief signal for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam? Supreme Court questions earlier bail denial | Left era ends in Kerala! V.D. Satheesan takes oath as CM after UDF’s massive comeback | Drone strike near UAE nuclear plant sparks panic—India calls it a ‘dangerous escalation' | Kathak to Garba: Indian diaspora stuns PM Modi with grand welcome in Amsterdam | ‘Geography or history’: Indian Army chief issues blunt warning to Pakistan over terror support | India, UAE ink key energy deals during Modi’s visit amid West Asia tensions | ‘There can be no better Bengal CM’: Mithun Chakraborty praises Suvendu Adhikari | PM Modi adviser Sanjeev Sanyal frontrunner for Bengal Finance Minister: Report | FIR against Abhishek Banerjee over ‘provocative speeches’ during West Bengal poll campaign | Madhya Pradesh High Court holds Bhojshala complex disputed site to be a temple
Delhi Riots
Umar Khalid (L) and Sharjeel Imam (R) are accused in the 2020 Delhi riots. Photo: Umar Khalid/X, SC website & Sharjeel Imam/Facebook

Big relief signal for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam? Supreme Court questions earlier bail denial

| @indiablooms | May 18, 2026, at 02:14 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court of India on Monday expressed strong reservations over its earlier judgement denying bail to former Jawaharlal Nehru University student leaders Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the Delhi riots conspiracy case, media reports said.

 

The apex court reaffirmed the principle that “bail is the rule and jail is the exception” even in cases registered under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Court questions dilution of precedent

A bench comprising Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan observed that the previous judgement denying bail appeared to dilute the binding precedent laid down by a larger bench in the landmark Union of India vs KA Najeeb case.

“They cannot dilute, circumvent or disregard binding precedent,” Justice Bhuyan said, as quoted by NDTV.

Earlier bail plea was rejected

In January this year, a Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and N. V. Anjaria had rejected the bail pleas of Khalid and Imam.

The court had then cited material on record indicating their alleged involvement in a criminal conspiracy and said it was satisfied with the prosecution’s submissions suggesting a prima facie case against the two accused.

Delhi riots conspiracy case

Khalid and Imam are accused under the UAPA in connection with the alleged “larger conspiracy” behind the communal violence that erupted in Northeast Delhi during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act protests.

The accused had approached the Supreme Court challenging a Delhi High Court order denying them bail and later filed special leave petitions against the decision.

The apex court had reserved its verdict on December 10, 2025.

2020 Delhi violence

The violence had broken out in the national capital during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), leaving 53 people dead and more than 700 injured.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.