June 14, 2026 04:00 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tragedy in the skies: Five IAF personnel killed in AN-32 crash in Assam | 'Ask probe officers whether I hid anything': Abhishek Banerjee hits back after pre-dawn police search | Police storm Abhishek Banerjee's house at 3 am tracking aide, Mamata arrives; seizure list says 'NIL' | Big boost for India's security: DRDO successfully tests advanced missile shield | Indian-origin man jailed for 34 years in UK over horrific kidnap, torture and rape case | Mamata's nightmare deepens! Saayoni Ghosh, Dev, Rachana Banerjee among 19 rebel MPs seeking TMC split | Trump claims US 'ended war with Iran', Tehran yet to confirm a deal | Heartbreak for Indian sports: Manu Bhaker's mentor Jaspal Rana passes away at 49 | Three Indian seafarers, missing after US strike on tanker near Oman, confirmed dead | 'Choose your side': TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee's ultimatum to Mamata in open revolt against Abhishek
Prashant Bhushan

New SC bench to hear 2009 contempt case against Prashant Bhushan on Sept 10

| @indiablooms | Aug 26, 2020, at 01:33 am

New Delhi/UNI: A new bench of the Supreme Court will hear the 2009 contempt case, in which activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan allegedly made remarks calling half of 16 former Chief Justices 'corrupt', on Sept 10.

Apex Court bench, headed by Justice Arun Mishra on Tuesday said that since he is retiring on Sept 2, there is a paucity of time to address the questions which would require a lengthy hearing.

The bench agreed to refer to an appropriate bench the question of conflict between the right to free speech and suo moto contempt powers of the court in the 2009 contempt case against Bhushan, which was initiated for calling past Chief Justices as 'corrupt.'

Justice Mishra said, since Bhushan's counsel, Rajeev Dhavan has raised many questions, there is a paucity of time, otherwise we would have heard the senior counsel with respect to the questions which have been proposed.

"However, since the matter is pending for the last 10 years, as prayed for, we fix the date for Sept 10 before an appropriate Bench as may deem fit by the Chief Justice," the top court asserted.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.