December 31, 2025 07:14 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
No third party involved: India govt sources refute China’s Operation Sindoor ceasefire claim | Amit Shah blasts TMC over border fencing; Mamata fires back on Pahalgam and Delhi blast | 'A profound loss for Bangladesh politics': Sheikh Hasina mourns Khaleda Zia’s death | PM Modi mourns Khaleda Zia’s death, hails her role in India-Bangladesh ties | Bangladesh’s first female Prime Minister Khaleda Zia passes away at 80 | India rejects Pakistan’s Christmas vandalism remarks, cites its ‘abysmal’ minority record | Minority under fire: Hindu houses torched in Bangladesh village | Supreme Court puts Aravalli redefinition on hold amid uproar, awaits new expert committee | Supreme Court strikes! Kuldeep Sengar’s bail in Unnao case suspended amid public outcry | From bitter split to big reunion! Pawars join hands again for high-stakes civic battle
Image Credit: video grab

Court rejects bail plea of Sharjeel Imam booked on sedition charges

| @indiablooms | Feb 18, 2024, at 07:20 am

New Delhi: A Delhi court rejected Sharjeel Imam's bail application in a sedition and Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) case.

Imam (36), a JNU scholar, has been accused of making inflammatory and instigating speeches during the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC) protests.

He was arrested on January 28, 2020, from Bihar for allegedly making a seditious speech and abetting riots in the Jamia Millia Islamia area in December last year.

Sharjeel had applied for bail, arguing that he had already served four years in prison out of a maximum sentence of seven years, making him eligible for statutory bail.

However, Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai dismissed the bail request, citing the unique nature of the allegations against Sharjeel and his involvement in "disruptive activities which ultimately led to the riots."

In a speech in Hindi, allegedly made at an anti-CAA protest, he purportedly said: "Time has come to tell the non-Muslims if they sympathise with us then they have to stand with us on our terms. If they cannot accept our terms, they are not our symapthisers."

"I have told this before and I am repeating it again that if we have 5 lakh people organised, we can permanently cut off Assam from rest of India, if not permanently then at least for a few months.

"Create ruckus on roads and railway tracks so that it takes them months to clear...it is our responsibility to cut off Assam from India. Only after Assam is seperated from India will they listen to us."

"We all know the condition of Muslims in Assam. CAA, NRC have been implemented there. People are being thrown into detention camps. There is a massacre going on there. In the next six to eight months we may find out all the Bengalis, whether Muslims or Hindus, have been killed," he said.

While rejecting his bail plea, the court said, “Considering the allegations against the applicant and his disruptive activities, the court deems it appropriate not to consider the relief as prayed for and to continue his custody.”

In Sharjeel Imam’s purported speech, which had gone viral, on social media, he said, "If we want to help Assam, we have to block the way for Army to reach Assam and also the supplies. And, we can do this. The chicken-neck corridor that connects the northeast with the rest of India is primarily inhabited by Muslims. Remember, if the masses are angry it should be used purposefully and not wasted on photo sessions,” he said.

In 2022, the trial court had framed charges against Imam under Sections 124A (sedition), 153A (promoting enmity), 153B (imputations prejudicial to national integration), 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) of IPC and Section 13 (Punishment for Unlawful Activities) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.