May 25, 2026 08:03 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Honoured to visit the Missionaries of Charity today, says Rubio after Kolkata visit, arrives in Delhi | Marco Rubio's India visit begins in Kolkata: Trade, defence and Quad talks take centre stage | Third fuel price hike in India in 10 days: Here’s what you’ll pay now | Big twist in RG Kar case! Calcutta HC orders fresh probe into evidence destruction allegations | Pulwama mastermind Hamza Burhan shot dead in PoK by unknown gunmen: Reports | NIA arrests Kolkata man for spying for Pakistan intelligence network | Cockroach Janta Party X handle withheld! Founder Abhijeet Dipke launches comeback account | Bengal govt makes Vande Mataram compulsory in all madrasas, extends school directive | RBI on alert! Interest rate hike may be coming as rupee crashes to fresh low | Big relief for Maharashtra employees! Fadnavis govt hikes DA to 60%
Bengal Polls
The Calcutta High Court order on ECI's transfer of Bengal officers is perceived as a jolt to TMC supremo Mamata Banerjee. Photo: ChatGPT/AITC X/Wikimedia/Gemini

‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal

| @indiablooms | Mar 31, 2026, at 03:40 pm

Kolkata/IBNS: The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Election Commission of India (ECI)’s large-scale transfer of IPS and IAS officers in West Bengal following the announcement of Assembly elections.

The court observed that the petitioner, advocate Arka Kumar Nag, had himself acknowledged the ECI’s authority, and therefore could not contest the poll body’s jurisdiction.

Chief Justice Sujoy Paul noted that the plea clearly recognised the Commission’s power to transfer officers to ensure free and fair elections, leaving no scope to dispute its authority.

The bench further held that it cannot question the “administrative wisdom” of the ECI unless there is clear evidence of arbitrariness, mala fide intent, or violation of statutory provisions.

Terming the allegations of mala fide as “unsubstantial”, the court rejected the state government’s claim that the transfers had led to administrative paralysis, noting that all transferred officers were promptly replaced.

Dismissing charges of vindictiveness and selective targeting of West Bengal, the court said data showed that a higher number of officers had been transferred in other poll-bound states.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.