April 02, 2026 05:22 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow | Fuel prices rise: Premium petrol, diesel hiked amid oil price surge | Commercial LPG up Rs 195.50 as global oil prices rise; domestic rates unchanged | Layoff alert: Oracle cuts 30,000 jobs globally, 12,000 hit in India | ‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal | Tennis icon Leander Paes joins BJP ahead of Bengal polls | 8 killed, several injured in crowd crush at Bihar temple in Nalanda | Trump signals exit from Iran war even as Strait of Hormuz remains shut: Report | Mystery death in Pakistan: JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother found dead

Supreme Court defers Shaheen Bagh hearing, says 'environment not conducive'

| @indiablooms | Feb 26, 2020, at 01:16 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: Citing the tensed atmosphere in the national capital over the Delhi violence, the Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred the hearing on the Shaheen Bagh case till Mar 23, media reports said.

The top court was about to hear the Public Interest Litigations (PILs) against the camping of several women and men at Delhi's Shaheen Bagh to protest against the contentious Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), which aims to provide citizenship to the Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi but not Muslim refugees who came to India from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh due to religious persecution before 2015.

"Environment isn't very conducive to hear Shaheen Bagh protests case. Sanity has to be maintained by everyone when a matter is to be heard," a bench comprising Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph said.

The top court has already appointed senior advocates, Sanjay Hegde and Sadhna Ramachandran, as the mediators whose job was to convince the Shaheen Bagh protestors to shift their agitation to some other place instead of blocking a road.

The two mediators had also submitted a report in a sealed envelop to the court.

The Supreme Court had earlier said, "We are not saying that people don’t have the right to raise their concerns. The question is where to protest? Because if this continues on the roads today for this legislation, tomorrow it could be done for another legislation."

The north-east Delhi was on boil for the last two days, when US President Donald Trump was incidentally in the national capital, over a fight between the supporters and protestors of CAA which has already kept the country on edge for over last two months.

20 people have been killed while 189 others injured in the violence.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.