April 16, 2026 09:55 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls | 'Black law': Stalin burns copy of 'delimitation' bill, slams Modi govt | TCS halts Nashik BPO operations amid sexual abuse, conversion allegations | ‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | Historic shift: Bihar gets first BJP CM as Samrat Choudhary takes oath | 'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping

Supreme Court begins hearing pleas seeking quashing of adultery law

| @indiablooms | Aug 02, 2018, at 11:36 am

New Delhi, Aug 2 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Wednesday began hearing to examine the constitutional validity of adultery law, media reports said.

The pleas have been made seeking quash of adultery provision in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) on the ground that it only victimizes men for having an extra-marital sexual relationship with a married woman.

Headed by Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra, a five-judge constitutional bench- comprising Justices RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra- is hearing the case.

The bench said it is not looking to make the offence for women as well.

According to the law, any man, who gets involved into a sexual intercourse with a married women without the permission of the woman's husband, not amounting to rape, will be considered to have committed adultery.

However, as per the law, the wife cannot be punished. The man can be punished with an imprisonment for a period which may extend to five years or with fine or both for committing adultery.

The bench also considered adultery as a reason for divorce.

Advocate Kaleeswaram Raj, an Indian who lives in Italy, told The Times Of India that he is seeking the quash of the law as it is not gender neutral and violates the fundamental right to privacy.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.