September 17, 2026 11:52 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi
Teen Pregnancy
Supreme Court upheld women's reproductive rights. Photo: ChatGPT/SC website

‘Let’s not choose for people capable of choosing’: Supreme Court to Centre on teen pregnancy termination

| @indiablooms | Apr 30, 2026, at 02:01 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: Upholding women’s rights over their bodies, the Supreme Court of India on Thursday came down heavily on the Centre over its curative plea challenging an earlier order that allowed a 15-year-old rape survivor to terminate her 31-week pregnancy, media reports said.

Court backs reproductive autonomy

The top court reaffirmed the primacy of individual choice and urged the government to revisit existing legal restrictions in such cases.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said, “Nothing can compensate the agony she suffered after the rape,” as quoted by NDTV.

“We respect individual choices and so should you…,” Justice Joymalya Bagchi told Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati.

Govt told not to dictate decisions

The court asked the Centre to guide the victim’s parents with medical advice on possible health risks instead of imposing decisions on them.

“Let us not choose for people capable of choosing,” the bench observed.

Centre’s stand questioned

The remarks came after the government argued that termination at this stage was not feasible and suggested delivery followed by adoption as the only option.

The court, however, had last week permitted the termination, underscoring that a woman’s reproductive autonomy must remain paramount.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.