February 04, 2026 09:25 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Justice crying behind closed doors’: Mamata Banerjee slams ECI in Supreme Court, CJI Kant assures solution | Mummy, Papa, sorry: Three sisters jump to death after parents object to online gaming | Supreme Court raps Meta, WhatsApp: ‘Theft of private information, won’t allow its use’ | ‘Completely surrendered’: Congress slams Modi after Trump’s trade deal move | PM Modi thanks 'dear friend' Trump for tariff reduction, hails strong US–India partnership | Trump announces US–India trade deal, lowers reciprocal tariffs to 18% | After Budget mayhem, bulls return: Sensex, Nifty stage sharp recovery | Dalai Lama wins first Grammy at 90 | Firing outside Rohit Shetty’s Mumbai home: 4 arrested, Bishnoi Gang link emerges | Female suicide attackers emerge at centre of deadly BLA assaults that rocked Pakistan’s Balochistan
SIR
Mamata Banerjee with other advocates in the Supreme Court. Photo: AITC/X

New Delhi/IBNS: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Wednesday took her political battle with the Election Commission of India (ECI) to the Supreme Court, launching a sharp attack on the poll body over the controversial Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

In an unusual moment in the top court, Banerjee bypassed her counsel and addressed the bench directly for nearly 10–15 minutes, raising concerns over what she described as discrimination against poll-bound West Bengal.

The bench, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, assured her that the court would attempt to resolve the differences and work towards a solution.

“Sir, the problem is… in the end, we are not getting justice anywhere. I have written six times to the ECI but still not getting any reply. Justice is crying behind closed doors,” the Chief Minister said, folding her hands before the bench.

As her submission progressed, Banerjee escalated her criticism of the Election Commission, alleging that the poll body was following a separate and unfair set of rules for West Bengal, one of the 12 states where the voter revision exercise is currently underway.

Repeating allegations she has made outside the courtroom, Banerjee claimed that voters’ names were deleted due to changes in surnames — a common occurrence among married women.

She also alleged that micro-observers appointed for the exercise were drawn from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-ruled states.

Responding to the allegations, the ECI submitted that non-cooperation by the West Bengal government had compelled it to appoint micro-observers from other states.

Banerjee further drew the court’s attention to six letters she claimed to have written to the Election Commission, alleging that none of them received a response.

Taking note of her submissions, the CJI Surya Kant-led bench issued notice to the Election Commission on Banerjee’s plea. The matter is scheduled to be heard next on Monday.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.