February 13, 2026 10:06 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Rs 5,000 to women ahead of Tamil Nadu polls! Vijay slams Stalin, says: ‘take the money, blow the whistle’ | Modi congratulates Tarique Rahman as BNP clinches majority in Bangladesh polls | Bangladesh Polls: Tarique Rahman-led BNP secures 'absolute majority' with 151 seats in historic comeback | BJP MP files notice to cancel Rahul Gandhi's Lok Sabha membership, seeks life-long ban | Arrested in the morning, out by evening: Tycoon’s son walks free in Lamborghini crash case | ‘Why should you denigrate a section of society?’: Supreme Court pulls up ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ makers | Bangladesh poll manifestos mirror India’s welfare schemes as BNP, Jamaat bet big on women, freebies | Drama ends: Pakistan makes U-turn on India boycott, to play T20 World Cup clash as per schedule | ‘Won’t allow any impediment in SIR’: Supreme Court pulls up Mamata govt over delay in sharing officers’ details | India-US trade deal: ‘Negotiations always two-way’, says Amul MD amid farmers’ concerns
Navjot Kaur Sidhu with husband Navjot Singh Sidhu. Photo: Official Facebook.

Congress suspends Navjot Kaur Sidhu over ‘Rs 500-crore suitcase’ remark, despite her clarification

| @indiablooms | Dec 08, 2025, at 11:21 pm

The Congress has suspended Navjot Kaur Sidhu, former MLA and wife of cricketer-turned-politician Navjot Singh Sidhu, after her explosive remark alleging that a “suitcase of Rs. 500 crore” can determine who becomes Chief Minister.

Her subsequent attempt to clarify the comment on social media failed to pacify the party leadership.

Navjot Kaur triggered a major political storm earlier this week when she told reporters that “the one who gives a suitcase of Rs 500 crore becomes the Chief Minister,” a statement that immediately embarrassed the Congress and handed opposition parties fresh ammunition.

Both the BJP and the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) seized on the remark, calling it an admission of corruption within the Congress.

Attempting damage control, she posted on X on day, saying her words were being twisted.

“I am shocked to see the twist given to a straight comment saying that our Congress party has never demanded anything from us. On being asked about Navjot becoming a CM face from any other party, I stated that we have no money to offer for a CM post. Listen carefully,” she wrote.

But the clarification did little to quell the internal outrage.

Her initial comments were made on December 6, shortly after meeting Punjab Governor Gulab Chand Kataria. Asked why her husband had stepped back from active politics, she responded that Navjot Singh Sidhu would only return if the Congress officially named him its chief ministerial candidate for 2027.

She then added that they did not have the Rs 500 crore allegedly required to “buy” the position, a remark interpreted by rivals as a suggestion of deep-rooted moneybag politics within the party.

Senior Congress leader Sukhjinder Randhawa strongly criticised the Sidhus, calling their statements “anti-party” and unacceptable.

AAP escalated the attack, questioning whether such a “Rs 500-crore suitcase” was meant for the Congress high command or Rahul Gandhi.

BJP leaders Sunil Jakhar and Tarun Chugh said the remark exposed “institutionalised corruption” inside the party.

With criticism mounting across the political spectrum, the Congress leadership opted to suspend Navjot Kaur Sidhu, signaling its intent to contain the controversy ahead of the 2027 political battle in Punjab.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.