October 01, 2026 02:19 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Israel-bound flight lands in Saudi Arabia as pilots fight in cockpit, stabbing triggers hijack scare mid-air | Vimal ad row: SRK, Ajay Devgn, Tiger Shroff respond to FDA notices, says Tukaram Mundhe | Vijay’s TVK expands to Bengal? Party breaks silence on Purba Bardhaman office | ‘This guy is a monster’: Trump’s hilarious praise for Sundar Pichai, Google CEO’s witty reply | Gyanesh Kumar row exposes INDIA bloc rift: DMK, AAP skip meet, Akhilesh sends representative | SIR row: Supreme Court to hear plea against CEC Gyanesh Kumar next week | Sambhal violence case: SC quashes key accused Mulla Afroz's NSA detention, slaps Rs 10 lakh cost on UP govt | Nandigram bypoll twist: Calcutta HC grants interim bail to Congress candidate Milan Pradhan till Oct 21 | Myanmar military airstrike horror: 49 killed, 58 injured as bombs hit crowded Rakhine market | Britain reopens refugee routes for Afghans, Palestinians as immigration and integration battle intensifies
Google-Apple
Representational image from Unsplash/Trac Vu/Amin Zabardast

Google, Apple lose multibillion dollar court fights with European Union

| @indiablooms | Sep 11, 2024, at 07:12 pm

Luxembourg/IBNS: Apple Inc. has lost its legal battle over a €13 billion ($14.4 billion) Irish tax bill, while Google has lost its challenge against a €2.4 billion fine for abusing its market power, reports Bloomberg.

These rulings mark a significant victory for the European Union (EU) in its efforts to regulate Big Tech, according to reports.

The EU’s Court of Justice in Luxembourg backed a landmark 2016 decision that Ireland had violated state aid laws by granting Apple an unfair tax advantage.

Additionally, in another victory for the EU’s antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager,
the same court ruled that Google had illegally used its search engine dominance to unfairly promote its own product listings.

Margrethe Vestager, who is just weeks away from departing the Brussels-based European Commission after two terms, made Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google top targets after taking up her role in 2014, reports Bloomberg.

The Apple decision represents the most significant achievement in Vestager's decade-long effort for tax fairness, which has also included scrutiny of companies like Amazon.com Inc. and Fiat, a unit of Stellantis NV.

Vestager has consistently argued that providing selective tax benefits to large corporations constitutes illegal state aid, which is prohibited under EU law.

Apple CEO Tim Cook previously dismissed the 2016 tax order as “total political crap,” while Google was fined in 2017 for using its search engine dominance to unfairly boost its own product listings.

Vestager had directed Ireland to recover the €13 billion, which has been held in escrow pending final rulings.

Apple expressed disappointment with the decision, noting that a previous court had annulled the case.

As of early Tuesday, Apple shares fell 1.3 percent to $218 in premarket trading.

Similarly, Google’s spokesperson expressed disappointment with the court's judgment and highlighted that a 2017 proposal to address the EU’s concerns led to increased visibility for other shopping services.

The EU’s actions against Google have prompted global scrutiny, extending beyond search dominance to a series of fines totaling over €8 billion.

The EU’s competition regulators hope that the recently implemented Digital Markets Act will address these issues comprehensively.

This regulation includes provisions that prevent Big Tech from prioritizing their own services over those of competitors, a measure influenced by the EU’s prolonged conflict with Google’s search dominance.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.