March 12, 2026 10:19 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals | 'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban | Indian stock market surges as Brent crude dips below $100 after Trump’s Iran remarks | Australia grants asylum to five Iranian women footballers after anthem protest; Albanese says ‘they are safe here’ | Trump administration labels Afghanistan ‘state sponsor of wrongful detention’ | Trump threatens Iran with ‘20 times harder’ strike if oil flow through Strait of Hormuz is disrupted
Sonam Wangchuk
Sonam Wangchuk during Ladakh protests. Photo: Screen-grab/Sonam Wangchuk X video

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court of India on Monday pulled up the Centre over the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, observing that there appeared to be “a certain malice” in the transcription of his speech, media reports said.

The top court criticised the government after noting that the transcript of Wangchuk’s three-minute speech had been expanded into a document running seven to eight minutes.

The remarks came during the hearing of a habeas corpus plea filed by his wife, Gitanjali Angmo.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Angmo, argued that several controversial phrases cited in the transcript — including “self-immolation of Ladakhis” and “overthrow the government” — were never spoken by Wangchuk.

Responding to the submissions, a bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and PB Varale questioned the authenticity of the transcription and asked the government to produce the original version of the speech.

Addressing Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, the bench said, as quoted by NDTV: “Mr Nataraj, we need the actual transcripts of these speeches. This is the basis on which the detention order is passed.”

The court further observed discrepancies between the transcript and the detention order, stating: “The tabular list you have filed, some of these things don’t even find a place in the detention order. There should be at least the correct transcript of what he says. There should not be a variance. If the speech is of three minutes and your transcription goes on for seven to eight minutes, there is certainly malice in that.”

When the ASG argued that the transcript had been prepared by the concerned department and that officials were “not experts,” the court responded sharply: “We are in the era of AI. Precision should be 98 per cent.”

Wangchuk was arrested for allegedly provoking a mob during protests demanding statehood for Ladakh. The agitation turned violent, resulting in the deaths of four protesters.

The protests were triggered in part by a hunger strike led by Wangchuk starting around September 10, 2025.

Additionally, two elderly protesters — 72-year-old Tsering Angchuk and 60-year-old Tashi Dolma — who had participated in an extended hunger strike, fell seriously ill and required hospitalisation.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.