April 30, 2026 05:07 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Not necessary to humiliate me with arrest’: Pawan Khera to SC over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | ‘Let’s not choose for people capable of choosing’: Supreme Court to Centre on teen pregnancy termination | I-PAC co-founder Vinesh Chandel gets bail after Bengal polls conclude | Exit Polls Give Bengal to BJP—But One Survey Begs to Differ | Big defence push: Rajnath Singh to hold high-stakes talks with Italy’s Defence Minister | “Voting without fear”: PM Modi hails record turnout in West Bengal polls | Mamata Banerjee trying to intimidate Hindu voters, alleges Suvendu Adhikari in Bhabanipur | Operation Sindoor boost: India is now fifth-largest military spender at USD 92.1 billion in 2025, Pakistan's spending is also up | ‘Got the guts?’ Derek O’Brien dares Modi to quit if Mamata Banerjee wins Bengal polls | ECI ‘harassing’ TMC, dancing to BJP’s tune: Mamata Banerjee in Bhabanipur
Sonam Wangchuk
Sonam Wangchuk during Ladakh protests. Photo: Screen-grab/Sonam Wangchuk X video

‘We are in the AI era’: Supreme Court blasts Centre over ‘malicious’ Sonam Wangchuk transcript

| @indiablooms | Feb 17, 2026, at 11:16 am

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court of India on Monday pulled up the Centre over the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, observing that there appeared to be “a certain malice” in the transcription of his speech, media reports said.

The top court criticised the government after noting that the transcript of Wangchuk’s three-minute speech had been expanded into a document running seven to eight minutes.

The remarks came during the hearing of a habeas corpus plea filed by his wife, Gitanjali Angmo.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Angmo, argued that several controversial phrases cited in the transcript — including “self-immolation of Ladakhis” and “overthrow the government” — were never spoken by Wangchuk.

Responding to the submissions, a bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and PB Varale questioned the authenticity of the transcription and asked the government to produce the original version of the speech.

Addressing Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, the bench said, as quoted by NDTV: “Mr Nataraj, we need the actual transcripts of these speeches. This is the basis on which the detention order is passed.”

The court further observed discrepancies between the transcript and the detention order, stating: “The tabular list you have filed, some of these things don’t even find a place in the detention order. There should be at least the correct transcript of what he says. There should not be a variance. If the speech is of three minutes and your transcription goes on for seven to eight minutes, there is certainly malice in that.”

When the ASG argued that the transcript had been prepared by the concerned department and that officials were “not experts,” the court responded sharply: “We are in the era of AI. Precision should be 98 per cent.”

Wangchuk was arrested for allegedly provoking a mob during protests demanding statehood for Ladakh. The agitation turned violent, resulting in the deaths of four protesters.

The protests were triggered in part by a hunger strike led by Wangchuk starting around September 10, 2025.

Additionally, two elderly protesters — 72-year-old Tsering Angchuk and 60-year-old Tashi Dolma — who had participated in an extended hunger strike, fell seriously ill and required hospitalisation.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.