June 30, 2026 11:42 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ram Temple donation scam: Former trust chief Champat Rai grilled by SIT for 2 hours, says report | Brazil escape Japan scare, Germany crash out as Paraguay script World Cup shocker | India overtakes Taiwan, South Korea to become world's fifth-largest equity market again | Pakistan strikes terror hideouts near Afghan border after Karachi bloodshed, 29 killed | Israel strikes back: Top October 7 militant “eliminated” in precision operation | Radharaman Das, who defended Bengal's vegetarian mid-day meal plan, loses ISKCON post | Fresh paper leak rocks India: Maharashtra TET postponed a day before exam, over 4 lakh aspirants affected | Pune fort murder case: Siya Goyal's brother says family would have called off marriage if she had objected | Donald Trump gets a road named after him in India, says 'Thank You!' | Fresh setback for Gautam Adani? US judge asks DoJ to justify dropping criminal charges
Teen Pregnancy
Supreme Court upheld women's reproductive rights. Photo: ChatGPT/SC website

‘Let’s not choose for people capable of choosing’: Supreme Court to Centre on teen pregnancy termination

| @indiablooms | Apr 30, 2026, at 02:01 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: Upholding women’s rights over their bodies, the Supreme Court of India on Thursday came down heavily on the Centre over its curative plea challenging an earlier order that allowed a 15-year-old rape survivor to terminate her 31-week pregnancy, media reports said.

Court backs reproductive autonomy

The top court reaffirmed the primacy of individual choice and urged the government to revisit existing legal restrictions in such cases.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said, “Nothing can compensate the agony she suffered after the rape,” as quoted by NDTV.

“We respect individual choices and so should you…,” Justice Joymalya Bagchi told Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati.

Govt told not to dictate decisions

The court asked the Centre to guide the victim’s parents with medical advice on possible health risks instead of imposing decisions on them.

“Let us not choose for people capable of choosing,” the bench observed.

Centre’s stand questioned

The remarks came after the government argued that termination at this stage was not feasible and suggested delivery followed by adoption as the only option.

The court, however, had last week permitted the termination, underscoring that a woman’s reproductive autonomy must remain paramount.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.