September 03, 2026 06:54 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR row: ‘No power to take action against law students’ | ‘Technical error, not U-turn’: Kerala CM Satheesan denies deleting video slamming cleric’s women remarks after Islamic Scholars’ meet | Bombay HC orders CBI probe into Sushant Singh Rajput's ex-manager Disha Salian's death case | Vijay for PM in 2029? TVK says Rahul Gandhi will ‘hold his hand’ to make him Prime Minister | CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics
Sonam Raghuvanshi is the key conspirator behind her husband murder during their honeymoon in Shillong. Photo: X.

Clerical error led to bail in Meghalaya honeymoon murder case: Court

| @indiablooms | Apr 29, 2026, at 11:00 pm

Sonam Raghuvanshi, accused of murdering her husband Raja Raghuvanshi during their 2025 honeymoon in Meghalaya, has been granted bail by a Shillong court after three earlier rejections.

Court records reviewed by NDTV suggest the decision may have been influenced by a possible “clerical error” in arrest documentation.

Key Issue: Wrong legal section cited

The court found inconsistencies in the paperwork related to her arrest:

The FIR correctly invoked Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which pertains to murder.

However, the “Intimation of Grounds of Arrest” reportedly cited Section 403(1) — which does not exist in the BNS framework.

Under the old IPC, Section 403 relates to dishonest misappropriation of property, creating confusion in the legal documentation.

The court noted that none of the arrest-related documents clearly informed her of the murder charge under Section 103(1), raising questions about procedural compliance.

Court flags multiple documentation errors

According to the order, the incorrect section number appeared across several official records, including:

  • Arrest memo
  • Rights intimation documents
  • Case diary extracts
  • Justification checklist for arrest

The court observed that such consistent errors could not easily be dismissed as a simple clerical mistake.

The court also pointed out that there was no evidence Sonam had legal representation during her initial court appearance in Ghazipur, which may have prevented earlier objection to the procedural lapses.

Bail granted with strict conditions

Sonam was granted bail by the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Judicial), Shillong, under these conditions:

  • No absconding or tampering with evidence/witnesses
  • Mandatory appearance in court on all hearing dates
  • No travel outside jurisdiction without permission
  • ₹50,000 personal bond with two sureties

Background of the case

Raja Raghuvanshi, an Indore-based businessman, married Sonam on May 11, 2025. The couple went to Meghalaya for their honeymoon on May 20 and soon went missing.

Raja’s body was recovered on June 2 from a gorge near Wei Sawdong Falls.

Investigators allege that Sonam, along with her alleged lover Raj Kushwaha and three hired men, plotted the murder and staged it as an accident.

Sonam later surrendered in Uttar Pradesh’s Ghazipur on June 9, while co-accused remain in custody.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.