September 14, 2026 02:41 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi | ‘Hospitality on another level’: South African official stunned by India’s BRICS hosting | Suvendu Adhikari eats fish bhog at Kalighat Temple amid Bageshwar Baba row | Bangladeshi Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das breaks down emotionally as he gets 5-hour parole to attend mother’s funeral | Sheikh Hasina’s daughter Saima Wazed quits WHO post amid fraud allegations | After days of silence, China confirms Xi Jinping’s India visit for BRICS Summit | Big setback for Abhishek Banerjee as CID arrests aide Sumit Roy | Firebrand Tukaram Mundhe’s Food Safety Blitz Hits ISKCON Juhu, 3 Licences Suspended | Vande Mataram row erupts in INDIA bloc: Congress objects, ally NC hits back, BJP pounces
Supreme Court

Supreme Court annuls WB's Housing Industry Regulation Act, calls it 'unconstitutional'

| @indiablooms | May 05, 2021, at 03:08 am

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down West Bengal's Housing Industry Regulation Act (WBHIRA) 2017, the law regulating the state’s real estate sector, calling it 'unconstitutional'.

The apex court said the eastern state's Housing Industry Regulation Act creates a parallel regime and is in direct conflict with the Centre’s Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).

It observed that this law has the potential to encroach upon the domain of the Parliament and hence is unconstitutional.

"…we have come to the conclusion that WB-HIRA is repugnant to the RERA, and is hence unconstitutional. We also hold and declare that as a consequence of the declaration by this Court of the invalidity of the provisions of WB-HIRA, there shall be no revival of the provisions of the WB 1993 Act, since it would stand impliedly repealed upon the enactment of the RERA,” the apex court order said.

The court said the state's housing act is quite similar to Centre's RERA and hence repugnant to Parliament's law,

“WB-HIRA is repugnant to the RERA, and is hence unconstitutional. We also hold and declare that as a consequence of the declaration by this Court of the invalidity of the provisions of WB-HIRA, there shall be no revival of the provisions of the WB 1993 Act, since it would stand impliedly repealed upon the enactment of the RERA,” the Supreme Court bench said in its 190-page order.

Reacting to the court's verdict, Housing and urban affairs minister Hardeep Singh Puri tweeted: "Big relief to Home Buyers of West Bengal. Hon’ble SC declares West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (WBHIRA) as unconstitutional. Benefits of #RERA the consumer protection law passed by Parliament, will now also be available to homebuyers of the state."

The court, however, said that homebuyers who have purchased properties under the state law before this verdict, will not have to worry as their registration and other acts would remain valid.

“Hence, in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 142, we direct that the striking down of WB-HIRA will not affect the registrations, sanctions and permissions previously granted under the legislation prior to the date of this judgment.”

West Bengal is the only state in the country that has not accepted the Centre's RERA.

The Central Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) came into effect on May 1, 2017, exactly a year after it was passed by the Parliament.

However, the Mamata Banerjee government rejecting the same implemented its own act titled West Bengal Housing & Industrial Regulation Act 2017 (WBHIRA).

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.