July 28, 2026 09:08 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Assam floods: Death toll stays at 68 as over 5.24 lakh continue to battle deluge | 'Probe is meaningless if responsibility isn't fixed': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over CJP protest crackdown | 'No protester will be left alone': CJP claims Centre shared FIR withdrawal copies after midnight talks | Bihar cop suspended after viral AK-47 firing video during NEET protest crackdown | After Dharmendra Pradhan's exit, 'E20 Janta Party' emerges, demands Nitin Gadkari's resignation over fuel policy | 'Can't lathicharge people just because they are protesting': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over NEET protest crackdown | 'Victory of democracy': Sonam Wangchuk congratulates Gen Z as Dharmendra Pradhan resigns after month-long NEET protests | 'Democracy has triumphed': CJP celebrates as Dharmendra Pradhan quits, warns Centre 'Don't mess with cockroaches' | Centre buckles under CJP-led NEET protests; Dharmendra Pradhan quits as Education Minister | Delhi Police flags 2,500 suspected criminals at Jantar Mantar amid NEET protest

SC strikes down Section 66A of IT Act

| | Mar 24, 2015, at 04:50 pm
New Delhi, Mar 24 (IBNS): In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the Section 66A of IT Act.

The apex court hold the section violative of 19(1) A of the Constitution which guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression to citizens.

The verdict on the issue was pronounced by a bench of Justices J Chelameswar and Rohinton F Nariman.

Under this section, the police had the power to arrest people for posting objectionable content online.

In this case, a conviction can give a maximum of three years in jail.

The validity of the section was challenged by a law student Shreya Singal and others.

After the apex court pronounced its verdict, Shreya Singhal said: It a big victory...The judges have upheld the rights of the citizens today."

"It has been misused. One needs to remember that the law should be for the people," she said.

Another petitioner, Bangladeshi writer

Taslima Nasreen tweeted: "A censorship ruling by the Supreme Court today could change the way the internet works for you."

 

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.