March 12, 2026 02:46 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals | 'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban | Indian stock market surges as Brent crude dips below $100 after Trump’s Iran remarks | Australia grants asylum to five Iranian women footballers after anthem protest; Albanese says ‘they are safe here’ | Trump administration labels Afghanistan ‘state sponsor of wrongful detention’ | Trump threatens Iran with ‘20 times harder’ strike if oil flow through Strait of Hormuz is disrupted
Kiren Rijiju
Image credit: Facebook/ Kiren Rijiju

Judges don't face elections: Kiren Rijiju's jibe amid Centre vs judiciary row

| @indiablooms | Jan 24, 2023, at 03:46 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju, one of the key speakers in the judges' row, Monday said judges do not have to contest elections or face public scrutiny but people still watch their work.

"The people are watching you and judging you. Your judgments, your work process, how you dispense justice... The people can see, and assess... They form opinions," he said to great applause at an event of the Delhi Bar Association.

He also reminded his audience that with the advent of social media, people now have the power to speak.

"It is not like the old days, when there was no platform and only netalog (leaders) could speak," he said.

In this context, he said the Chief Justice had sought his help about the abuse judges face on social media.

"How to control that? Now, judges cannot respond to it on social media. The government was requested to take a firm step... I have taken note of it and have the solution," he added.

He said there have been many changes since 1947, so it would be wrong to think that the existing system will carry on and never be questioned.

This comes government has been seeking a larger role in the appointment of judges, arguing that the legislature is supreme since it represents the will of the people.

The Supreme Court has issued a stern reminder to the government that while parliament can make a law, it is within the court's power to "scrutinise" it.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.