April 02, 2026 03:51 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow | Fuel prices rise: Premium petrol, diesel hiked amid oil price surge | Commercial LPG up Rs 195.50 as global oil prices rise; domestic rates unchanged | Layoff alert: Oracle cuts 30,000 jobs globally, 12,000 hit in India | ‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal | Tennis icon Leander Paes joins BJP ahead of Bengal polls | 8 killed, several injured in crowd crush at Bihar temple in Nalanda | Trump signals exit from Iran war even as Strait of Hormuz remains shut: Report | Mystery death in Pakistan: JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother found dead

Deadline for linking Aadhaar to welfare schemes extended to Dec. 31, Centre tells SC

| | Aug 30, 2017, at 07:38 pm
New Delhi, Aug 30 (IBNS) : The Centre on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that the deadline for the mandatory linking of Aadhaar to social welfare schemes for availing their benefits has been extended from September 30 to December 31, 2017, The Hindu reported.

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal submitted before a Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra about the extension in deadline during an urgent mentioning in the court by petitioners who have challenged the validity of the Aadhaar scheme and the Aadhaar Act of 2016.

The petitioners, represented by senior advocate Shyam Divan, wanted an early hearing since the last date for linking the Aadhaar cards of beneficiaries to these welfare schemes fell on September 30.

On hearing  Venugopal's submission that the deadline has been extended, the Bench posted the Aadhaar petitions for hearing to November first week.

The Bench, led by Justie J. Chelameswar, had referred the petitions for hearing before a five-judge Bench, keeping in mind the pertinent legal question - whether privacy is a fundamental right or not - that had to be answered first.

The five-judge Bench had referred the legal question to a nine-judge Bench to nunerically overcome the MP Sharma and Kharak Singh judgments, which had declared that privacy is not a fundamental right.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.