April 01, 2026 04:32 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow | Fuel prices rise: Premium petrol, diesel hiked amid oil price surge | Commercial LPG up Rs 195.50 as global oil prices rise; domestic rates unchanged | Layoff alert: Oracle cuts 30,000 jobs globally, 12,000 hit in India | ‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal | Tennis icon Leander Paes joins BJP ahead of Bengal polls | 8 killed, several injured in crowd crush at Bihar temple in Nalanda | Trump signals exit from Iran war even as Strait of Hormuz remains shut: Report | Mystery death in Pakistan: JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother found dead

CJI has power of allocating cases: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jul 06, 2018, at 11:57 am

New Delhi, July 6 (IBNS): Responding to a petition filed by former law minister Shanti Bhushan, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) has the power to allocate cases, media reports said.

The top court has referred to the CJI as "master of roster".

Bhushan had called for a panel to decide on who has the power of assigning cases.

Three months ago, a three-judge bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra held that the CJI has sole power to decide on cases allocation.

The SC has been quoted by NDTV, "There is no dispute that the Chief Justice is the master of roster and allocates cases to Judges. The constitution is silent on the Chief Justice. Conventions and judgements over the time and accepted by all stake holders that the Chief Justice is first among judges and senior most."

In January, four senior judges of the top court- Justices Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph- had called an unprecedented press conference to allege that cases with far reaching consequences were assigned to selective judges.

Justice Chelameswar, who represented the four judges in the press conference, said they had approached the CJI with a letter but failed to convince him.


 

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.