June 29, 2025 07:28 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Law student allegedly gang-raped in Kolkata college, three arrested | India calls for merit-based treatment of US visa applications as Trump administration tightens rules | Black box data of crashed Air India aircraft recovered and downloaded: Govt | India refuses to sign SCO joint statement lacking Pahalgam attack but featuring Balochistan unrest | I ended India-Pak conflict with a series of phone calls on trade: Donald Trump reiterates 'ceasefire' claim | Constitution is supreme, all three wings work under it: CJI BR Gavai | Andhra Pradesh murder: Police say wife and her lover killed 26-year-old Tejeswar | 'Vladimir Putin called to help with Iran, I refused': Donald Trump | Engineering issues: British High Commission on F-35 fighter jet stuck in Kerala | Don't ask permission to fly: Shashi Tharoor after Mallikarjun Kharge's snub over article praising PM
FCRA

'Framing of laws a sovereign prerogative': India's reply on FCRA

| @indiablooms | Oct 21, 2020, at 04:20 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: India on Tuesday issued a firm response to UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachellete's remarks questioning India's new FCRA regulations.

Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Anurag Srivastava on Tuesday said: “We have seen some comments by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on an issue relating to the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA). India is a democratic polity based on the rule of law and an independent judiciary. The framing of laws is obviously a sovereign prerogative. Violations of law, however, cannot be condoned under the pretext of human rights. A more informed view of the matter was expected of a UN body.”

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachellete had called on India over the new FCRA, which prohibits receipts of  funds "for any activities prejudicial to the public interest."

She expressed regret at the legal constraints the new law, which a number UN human rights bodies have said is "overbroad in its objective" and "vaguely worded", put on non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and Human Rights organisations.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu