August 19, 2026 01:24 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court rejects ‘less painful’ death penalty plea, but leaves door open for future change | ‘Vulgarity and disgust’: DMK attacks Vijay over Trisha salute at I-Day event | ‘Take Gyanesh Kumar to the US’: Congress mocks Trump over praise for India’s voter ID system | Big relief for Imran Khan: Pakistan Supreme Court orders hospital transfer amid health fears | Trump praises India’s voter ID system, pushes SAVE America Act | Trump's shock threat to bomb Oman: US President warns ally over Iran deal and Hormuz crisis | Rishabh Pant scripts history! Indian wicketkeeper-batter joins elite 100-sixes club in Test cricket | BJP reshuffles top organisation seven months after Nitin Nabin's elevation | West Bengal STF arrests suspected aide of ISI 'agent' Rana Rauf in Kolkata | ‘Very hopeful’: Indian envoy Dinesh Trivedi breaks silence on PM Tarique Rahman’s proposed India visit
CJI
Image Credit: wikipedia.org

Two Delhi HC judges recuse from hearing plea challenging Justice D Y Chandrachud's appointment as CJI

| @indiablooms | Jan 14, 2023, at 01:25 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Delhi High Court Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad Friday opted out of hearing a plea that sought a review of an HC order dismissing a petition challenging the appointment of Justice D Y Chandrachud as the Chief Justice of India (CJI), reported media.

The plea also includes certain allegations against the judges, the division bench of the high court noted, adding that it cannot hear the case.

The petition will be heard by another bench on January 16, the bench headed by Chief Justice Sharma said.

On November 11, 200, the high court had dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the appointment of Justice D Y Chandrachud as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and Rs 1 lakh towards costs on the petitioner Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari, the national president of an organisation named Gram Uday Foundation.

While dismissing the plea, the bench had said the offices held by the constitutional functionaries in public trust are not open to denigration by self-styled warriors of public interest on the basis of superficial allegations.

In his review plea, the petitioner has sought to overrule the earlier order as well as to waive the costs.

"Imposing penalty for such a petition is the most unjust and unconstitutional action of the chief justice and his companion judge. Hence the review petition is filed," he alleged, according to the report.

Justice Chandrachud took oath as the 50th CJI on November 9, 2022.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.