August 19, 2026 01:47 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court rejects ‘less painful’ death penalty plea, but leaves door open for future change | ‘Vulgarity and disgust’: DMK attacks Vijay over Trisha salute at I-Day event | ‘Take Gyanesh Kumar to the US’: Congress mocks Trump over praise for India’s voter ID system | Big relief for Imran Khan: Pakistan Supreme Court orders hospital transfer amid health fears | Trump praises India’s voter ID system, pushes SAVE America Act | Trump's shock threat to bomb Oman: US President warns ally over Iran deal and Hormuz crisis | Rishabh Pant scripts history! Indian wicketkeeper-batter joins elite 100-sixes club in Test cricket | BJP reshuffles top organisation seven months after Nitin Nabin's elevation | West Bengal STF arrests suspected aide of ISI 'agent' Rana Rauf in Kolkata | ‘Very hopeful’: Indian envoy Dinesh Trivedi breaks silence on PM Tarique Rahman’s proposed India visit
Kiren Rijiju
Image credit: Facebook/ Kiren Rijiju

Judges don't face elections: Kiren Rijiju's jibe amid Centre vs judiciary row

| @indiablooms | Jan 24, 2023, at 03:46 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju, one of the key speakers in the judges' row, Monday said judges do not have to contest elections or face public scrutiny but people still watch their work.

"The people are watching you and judging you. Your judgments, your work process, how you dispense justice... The people can see, and assess... They form opinions," he said to great applause at an event of the Delhi Bar Association.

He also reminded his audience that with the advent of social media, people now have the power to speak.

"It is not like the old days, when there was no platform and only netalog (leaders) could speak," he said.

In this context, he said the Chief Justice had sought his help about the abuse judges face on social media.

"How to control that? Now, judges cannot respond to it on social media. The government was requested to take a firm step... I have taken note of it and have the solution," he added.

He said there have been many changes since 1947, so it would be wrong to think that the existing system will carry on and never be questioned.

This comes government has been seeking a larger role in the appointment of judges, arguing that the legislature is supreme since it represents the will of the people.

The Supreme Court has issued a stern reminder to the government that while parliament can make a law, it is within the court's power to "scrutinise" it.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.