February 05, 2026 02:33 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Justice crying behind closed doors’: Mamata Banerjee slams ECI in Supreme Court, CJI Kant assures solution | Mummy, Papa, sorry: Three sisters jump to death after parents object to online gaming | Supreme Court raps Meta, WhatsApp: ‘Theft of private information, won’t allow its use’ | ‘Completely surrendered’: Congress slams Modi after Trump’s trade deal move | PM Modi thanks 'dear friend' Trump for tariff reduction, hails strong US–India partnership | Trump announces US–India trade deal, lowers reciprocal tariffs to 18% | After Budget mayhem, bulls return: Sensex, Nifty stage sharp recovery | Dalai Lama wins first Grammy at 90 | Firing outside Rohit Shetty’s Mumbai home: 4 arrested, Bishnoi Gang link emerges | Female suicide attackers emerge at centre of deadly BLA assaults that rocked Pakistan’s Balochistan
Chennai-based techie Prasanna Sankar and his wife Dhivya. Photo courtesy: X/@myprasanna

Chennai techie counters wife’s ‘sex-predator’, ‘abduction of their child’ charges amid bitter custody battle

| @indiablooms | Mar 27, 2025, at 12:42 am

Chennai/IBNS: A Chennai-based tech entrepreneur, who had accused his estranged wife of harassment amid a bitter divorce and custody battle of their son, has doubled down on his charges, media reports said.

Prasanna Sankar, the co-founder of Rippling, a start-up firm, has shared a point-by-point rebuttal to his wife Dhivya's charges that he had "kidnapped" their nine-year-old son and was a "sex predator".

Dhivya had made the accusations after Sankar went public with their legal dispute and accused her of using the police to harass him since she was unhappy with their divorce settlement.

He had claimed that his wife filed numerous cases against him in Singapore - including those of rape and leaking her nude videos - but the police found them to be false.

Sankar has now added WhatsApp screenshots and email exchanges between their lawyers in a long thread, accusing his wife of "abducting" their son to the US from Singapore.

He accused his wife of "brainwashing" their son into believing that his father had abandoned him.

In one of the screenshots, he said that his wife had "voluntarily instructed" him to pick up their son from her house as per the mutually agreed terms, contrary to the claim that he took him by force or "kidnapped the child".

He also shared an email exchange between their lawyers in the US, which appeared to show the two sides had agreed to a "mutual consent divorce in India" and shared custody of their son.

The email detailed the division of assets and said Dhivya must get monthly support of $5,000. Sankar agreed to pay for all expenses of the child and have a "50/50 parenting plan".

He said this contradicted his wife's claim that he had "forced" her to sign the agreement against her will. They had not spoken for months, he claimed.

He also contested Dhivya's claim that he forced her to come to India from Singapore - by sharing a court ruling that appeared to show she was ordered to return the child. The filing mentions the court ruling was in the favour of Prasanna, but does not share any detail about the case.

The incident came to light after Sankar, in a series of X posts, narrated how he was allegedly harassed by his wife.

In the post, Sankar claimed he was on the run from Tamil Nadu.

Sankar said his 10-year marriage with his wife Dhivya collapsed over the latter's alleged extra-marital affair.

Amid their negotiating process as a part of divorce, Sankar claimed his wife filed a fake police complaint accusing him of assaulting her and raping her.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.