August 19, 2026 12:55 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court rejects ‘less painful’ death penalty plea, but leaves door open for future change | ‘Vulgarity and disgust’: DMK attacks Vijay over Trisha salute at I-Day event | ‘Take Gyanesh Kumar to the US’: Congress mocks Trump over praise for India’s voter ID system | Big relief for Imran Khan: Pakistan Supreme Court orders hospital transfer amid health fears | Trump praises India’s voter ID system, pushes SAVE America Act | Trump's shock threat to bomb Oman: US President warns ally over Iran deal and Hormuz crisis | Rishabh Pant scripts history! Indian wicketkeeper-batter joins elite 100-sixes club in Test cricket | BJP reshuffles top organisation seven months after Nitin Nabin's elevation | West Bengal STF arrests suspected aide of ISI 'agent' Rana Rauf in Kolkata | ‘Very hopeful’: Indian envoy Dinesh Trivedi breaks silence on PM Tarique Rahman’s proposed India visit
Basavaraj Bommai
Image credit: Facebook/ Basavaraj Bommai

Basavraj Bommai seeks resolution of border row with Maharashtra as per State Reorganisation Act

| @indiablooms | Dec 21, 2022, at 05:45 am

Belagavi/UNI: Karnataka Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai on Tuesday sought the cooperation of the Opposition members in both houses of the legislature to pass a resolution reiterating the state's stand on an inter-state border row with Maharashtra as per the 1956 State Reorganisation Act.

"If everyone agrees, while giving the government's reply on the border issue debate, we will pass a resolution reiterating the state's stand in both Houses of the legislature," he said in the assembly, replying to LoP Siddaramaiah's submissions.

He added: "In the Mahajan Report, there are two ways. As per the report, some villages under Solapur and Akkalkot will (be merged with Karnataka and some parts of Khanapur and Karwar areas will go to Maharashtra). Therefore I am saying we should discuss it (based on Mahajan report). Therefore, we should make this proposal. Instead, we should stay with (the demarcation of boundaries made as per) the State Reorganisation Act."

Bommai replied to LoP Siddaramaiah's submissions that "there is no question of any dispute, and the border issue is already settled with the Mahajan Commission report."

Making his submissions on the issue, Congress member HK Patil said Bommai should not have attended the meeting summoned by Union Home Minister Amit Shah because Maharashtra wanted to show that there was an existence of border issue, which is actually a settled issue.

"It is just Maharashtra's ploy to keep the issue alive for reaping political mileage out of the border dispute," Patil said.

He also stated that Bommai should not have accepted the proposal for setting up a committee consisting of three ministers each from both states because "the issue has already been settled."

Reacting to it, Bommai said the meeting was convened for the sake of maintenance of law and order, and in a federal setup, it was mandatory to attend it.

"In the meeting, Shah clearly stated that the border dispute can only be solved through Constitutional and legal means. The case is before the Supreme Court, and it cannot be settled on the streets," he said, adding that the ministerial committee from both sides is to maintain peace and to resolve smaller issues between the two states.

The dispute had intensified in the last couple of weeks, with vehicles from either side being targeted, leaders from both states weighing in, and pro-Kannada and Marathi activists being detained by police amid a tense atmosphere in Belagavi.

The Bommai-led government maintains the demarcation on linguistic lines as per the States Reorganisation Act.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.