April 14, 2026 08:54 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation | ED raids ex-Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee; SSC scam resurfaces ahead of polls | Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto

Higher immigration to benefit Canada, study finds

| @indiablooms | Oct 03, 2017, at 04:15 am
Ottawa, Oct 2 (IBNS): Higher immigration in Canada would hardly affect the country adversely, rather it would benefit in some ways, according to a recent study, media reports said.

The report of the study, which was conducted by the Conference Board of Canada, released on Monday, has been quoted by the Star:"Our forecast suggests that the status quo would be best for improving real gross domestic product per capita, but would have the smallest impact on alleviating Canada’s economic and fiscal pressures."

"Immigration has a small effect on domestic workers. As such, it does not appear likely that higher levels would have an adverse impact on wages and employment rates in Canada,” it added.

The study has tried to find out the result, keeping the present immigration number of 0.82% constant and then increasing it to 1% and 1.11% of the total population.

The study has been conducted to find out the impact on certain domains, keeping the composition of the immigration fixed like 60% economic class, 28% family class and 12% refugees.

In the present scenario, the study found out, the GDP growth would rise at an average 1.85% between 2017 and 2040.

If the immigration levels were increased to 1% and 1.11% of the total population, the GDP growth would rise by 1.94% and 2.05% respectively.

The present population growth in the country, which is 114,000 roughly, will certainly drop to zero by 2033 as the death rate will surpass the birth rate.

"We forecast that immigration will begin to account for all of Canada’s population growth by 2033, assuming that the annual immigration rate remains around 0.82 per cent of the population" the report was quoted by the Star.

Under the present status, the senior people will comprise 24% of the total population and the workers-to-retirees ratio will fall from present 3.64 to 2.37 by 2040.

The report said: "The medium and high scenarios … reduce the proportion of the population that is 65 and over, reduce health-care costs as a share of provincial revenues and slightly improve the workers-per-retirees ratio in comparison to the status quo."

"There could be negative economic and fiscal consequences, especially if immigration levels increase and Canada does not effectively address the labour market challenges that immigrants commonly face,” the report was quoted by the Star.

"With Canada becoming more reliant on immigrants to meet its labour market needs, the success of its immigration system will greatly depend on its ability to improve the labour market outcomes of immigrants, expand its absorptive capacity and maintain public support for immigration,” it added.


(Reporting by Souvik Ghosh)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.