September 24, 2026 11:44 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials | Nandigram bypoll shock: Calcutta HC shields Congress candidate Milan Pradhan in 2007 case, but will he walk free? | ‘I don’t care if you die’: Driver’s chilling response before Noida bus went up in flames | Contempt case against CEC Gyanesh Kumar? Supreme Court advocate seeks AG's consent | Days after Jamui outrage, another girl sexually harassed in Bihar; 4 arrested | 9 burnt to death as sleeper bus carrying 35 catches fire on Noida highway | ‘Gyanesh, it’s done bro!’: CJP turns up heat on CEC after explosive SIR report
Golden Dome
Trump announced constructing Golden Dome in his second tenure. Photo: White House

Trump’s Golden Dome shock: Missile shield price tag balloons to USD 1.2 trillion

| @indiablooms | May 13, 2026, at 02:39 pm

US President Donald Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” missile defence system is projected to cost approximately $1.2 trillion (£882 billion) to develop, deploy, and operate over the next two decades, according to a report released by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

The estimate is significantly higher than the initial projection of $175 billion (£129 billion).

“A national missile defence system possessing capabilities broadly consistent with those outlined in the executive order would cost about $1.2 trillion to develop, deploy, and operate for 20 years,” the report stated, noting that all costs are expressed in 2026 dollars.

Of the total projected cost, acquisition expenses alone would exceed $1 trillion, covering the system’s key components, including interceptor layers and a space-based missile warning and tracking system.

“That amount includes costs for the system’s major components—namely, the interceptor layers and a space-based missile warning and tracking system. It also includes costs for general, ongoing research and development and improvements in the system’s integration and performance,” the report added.

Trump unveiled the ambitious missile shield project shortly after returning to the White House, describing it as a necessary safeguard against “next-generation” aerial threats.

The CBO report identified the space-based interceptor layer as the most expensive part of the programme, accounting for nearly 70 percent of acquisition costs and 60 percent of total expenditure.

According to the assessment, the proposed system would be capable of fully countering an attack launched by a regional adversary with limited capabilities, such as North Korea, or a small-scale strike from near-peer rivals such as Russia or China.

However, the report warned that the system could be overwhelmed by a full-scale assault from a major military power.

Meanwhile, Russia has announced the successful test-firing of its RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), a nuclear-capable weapon widely described by Moscow as one of the most powerful missile systems ever developed.

According to the Kremlin’s official website, President Vladimir Putin hailed the launch as a major milestone, calling the Sarmat “the most powerful missile system in the world” and comparing it to the Soviet-era Voevoda missile currently in Russia’s arsenal.

Putin further claimed that the Sarmat’s total warhead yield is more than four times greater than that of any existing Western counterpart. Western defence analysts have nicknamed the missile “Satan 2.”

Military expert and air defence historian Yuri Knutov, speaking to Sputnik, said the missile’s defining capability is its ability to carry multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing each warhead to strike separate targets independently.

Knutov also argued that even advanced missile defence systems, including Trump’s proposed Golden Dome shield, could struggle to intercept warheads using suborbital trajectories and hypersonic manoeuvring capabilities, raising fresh questions about the effectiveness of next-generation missile defence architecture.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.